BlackRock and Fidelity’s Spot Bitcoin ETF Filings Are Unclear and Incomprehensive, SEC Says
It has been just revealed that BlackRock and Fidelity’s BTC ETF filings are not clear, and not comprehensive enough. Check out the latest reports about this below. BlackRock and Fidelity’s BTC ETF are not good enough, SE...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
It has been just revealed that BlackRock and Fidelity’s BTC ETF filings are not clear, and not comprehensive enough. Check out the latest reports about this below.
BlackRock and Fidelity’s BTC ETF are not good enough, SEC saysAccording to a recent report by The Wall Street Journal, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has expressed concerns regarding BlackRock and Fidelity’s applications for a Bitcoin (BTC) exchange-traded fund (ETF).
The regulatory agency reportedly informed Nasdaq and the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE), who submitted the applications on behalf of the companies, that they are unclear and incomplete.
According to reports, some experts monitoring the situation predicted that BlackRock’s proposal, which involves sharing “surveillance” of a Bitcoin ETF with Nasdaq, would satisfy the SEC.
This ETF would allow investors to buy and monitor Bitcoin through a brokerage, similar to stocks and commodities like gold.
The regulatory agency rejected the filings as they did not specify the name of the Bitcoin ETF that needed to have a surveillance agreement, nor did they provide details on how the agreement would work.
Bloomberg’s senior ETF analyst, Eric Balchunas, believes that this could be seen as positive news.
“Basically [the] SEC wants them to name the ‘crypto exchange’ and give more details on [surveillance agreement]. That’s understandable, arguably good news. I was under [the] impression they’d have to update that as well.”
BlackRock ETF in the newsA new NFT collection called BlackRock, which combines the concept of EtherRock with the branding of investment giant BlackRock, has already accumulated a total trading volume of 398 ETH or $749,000.
This follows BlackRock’s recent filing for a Bitcoin ETF, although the investment firm has no association with the NFT project, as stated in the collection’s OpenSea profile. EtherRock was initially launched in 2017 as a collection of 100 rocks. During the NFT frenzy, prices for its NFTs soared as high as $1.8 million.
The BlackRock meme collection has 999 individual NFTs that are selling at a floor price of 0.245 ETH, which is worth about $462 as of publication time. The collection sold out on June 21, 2023. This recent activity caused it to be trending on OpenSea.
Why this matters
This bitcoin story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on CryptoGazetteRelated market context
Wallet-Drainer Attack on DeFi Front Ends Traces to Name.com, With Cause Still Unclear
Domain registrar Name.com said on Saturday that a number of domains on its platform “were improperly redirected late Friday as par...
SEC Charges BG Wealth and DSJ Exchange Over Alleged $130M Crypto Scheme
TL;DR: The SEC alleges BG Wealth and DSJ Exchange raised more than $130 million using false filings and trading claims. The civil...
Next Technology Authorizes Sale or Pledge of 5,833 Bitcoin After Risk Review
TL;DR: Next Technology has authorized selling or pledging its reported 5,833 BTC. The decision creates flexibility; it does not co...
BTCC Exchange Supports Red Eagle Foundation’s 2026 Charity Golf Season Finale, Featuring Ashley Cole as Headline Guest
GEORGE TOWN, Cayman Islands, November 1st — BTCC, the world’s longest-serving cryptocurrency exchange, sponsored the final Red Eag...
Uniswap turns eight, says DEXs now hold 40% of exchange market share
The rise of DEXs to 40% market share signifies a major shift towards decentralized finance, challenging traditional centralized ex...
EU entity suspected of losing $106 million from crypto exchange accounts, ZachXBT says
The unidentified attacker moved funds through ether, instant exchanges and Monero, but the victim and affected exchanges remain un...