Neal Katyal Argues For Bitcoin Regulation
At Bitcoin 2022, Constitutional lawyer Neal Katyal argued that Bitcoiners should be open to some regulation to ultimately protect the technology.As one of the world’s most lauded outlines of basic human freedoms and prol...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
At Bitcoin 2022, Constitutional lawyer Neal Katyal argued that Bitcoiners should be open to some regulation to ultimately protect the technology.
As one of the world’s most lauded outlines of basic human freedoms and prolific examples of consensus-enforced governing, the U.S. Constitution is often pointed to as a spiritual predecessor of the freedoms and equity promised by Bitcoin.
Emphasizing and challenging these parallels, Georgetown University Law Professor Neal Katyal and Justin Wales, the head of legal for North America at bitcoin exchange Crypto.com, addressed Bitcoin 2022 attendees in a discussion titled “The U.S. Constitution And Bitcoin.”
"I love Bitcoin, I love all you and you guys see something really important and I want to help tell your story," Katyal told the crowd. “I don't think that right now Washington... has a handle on how important these technologies [like Bitcoin] are to our economy, to our national security."
Wales pressed Katyal on whether or not there is a Constitutional case to be made for the fundamental right to commit bitcoin transactions. While Katyal acknowledged that using Bitcoin has some overlap with free speech rights, he clarified that he does not think there’s a strong Constitutional case to be made there.
“At its core, I view Bitcoin as a democratic tool,” Wales explained at one point, adding context to the questions he was posing for Katyal. “It says we, as a community, want to opt out of a system that is governed completely by a federal fiat monetary system."
But, while Katyal seemed to agree that the power to transact outside of the fiat monetary rails is a critical freedom granted by Bitcoin, he indicated that Bitcoiners are unlikely to convince Constitutional courts that the space should be free from regulation.
"I think it's gonna be hard to say that bitcoin transactions are protected by the first amendment [of the Constitution],” Katyal said. “My central message to everyone today is I think we need to be telling the story for why some regulation in the space is OK. Because if we don’t … I think that’s an unlikely winner.”
Bitcoin 2022 is part of the Bitcoin Event Series hosted by BTC Inc, the parent company of Bitcoin Magazine.
Why this matters
This bitcoin story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on Bitcoin MagazineRelated market context
Ethereum Delays Glamsterdam Testnet Step Over Gas-Accounting Risks
TL;DR: Ethereum developers have postponed the next Glamsterdam hard-fork step on the Hoodi testnet after researchers identified ap...
Ethereum (ETH) Price Prediction: Whale Accumulation Builds as $2,350 Reclaim Could Restart the Recovery
Ethereum is starting November at an important point in its recovery. According to Brave New Coin, ETH is trading near $2,230, with...
If Crypto Can Be Frozen, Is It Yours?
Hackers took $6.43 billion from Binance on Oct. 29, according to blockchain analytics firm Elliptic. Within about an hour, Tether...
TRON Tops Ethereum in USDT With $92.25B Stablecoin Supply and $2.18T Q3 Transfers
Key Takeaways: TRON has been ahead of Ethereum with an average trade size of USDT worth $90.75 billion within Q3. Supply of stable...
Amundi Puts a European Equity Fund Share Class on Ethereum
TL;DR: Amundi has launched a tokenised share class of its Core STOXX Europe 600 equity index fund on public Ethereum, working with...
Grayscale says Ethereum leads smart contract platforms in stablecoins and tokenized assets
Ethereum's dominance in smart contracts and tokenization underscores its pivotal role in bridging traditional finance with blockch...