PayPal Fines Up To $2,500 For Intolerance: Bitcoin Fixes This
The User Agreement lays out terms and conditions for services users are allowed to use with funds from PayPal, allowing the censoring of its customers’ money.PayPal has a fine in place for “intolerance” for up to $2,500...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
The User Agreement lays out terms and conditions for services users are allowed to use with funds from PayPal, allowing the censoring of its customers’ money.
PayPal has a fine in place for “intolerance” for up to $2,500 embedded into its terms and conditions.
Located in PayPal’s User Agreement, the company states:
“You acknowledge and agree that $2,500.00 U.S. dollars per violation of the Acceptable Use Policy is presently a reasonable minimum estimate of PayPal’s actual damages.”
The Acceptable Use Policy includes a clause that warns against “the promotion of hate, violence, racial or other forms of intolerance that is discriminatory or the financial exploitation of a crime, [and] items that are considered obscene.”
Specifically, PayPal is saying that you cannot use its services in order to pay for anything that results in any of the criteria listed above. However, the issue that can result in such an attempt aimed at the censorship or one’s own money is that the ideas of “intolerance” and “items that are considered obscene” could arguably be considered subjective.
Thus, PayPal positions itself as the arbitrator of what is the proper way to use funds that do not belong to the company. In doing so, the company creates echoes of criticism surrounding China’s development of its central bank digital currency (CBDC), the digital yuan.
Critics of China’s CBDC cite concerns of the nation-state’s ability to control what residents can and cannot choose to spend their money on, and paired with China’s social credit system which can serve as a blacklist for unapproved behavior, the criticism is easily understandable.
Bitcoin cannot be censored in the way that China can control its CBDC, or in the way PayPal tries to censor services its customers are permitted to use. Bitcoin is the antithesis of financial censorship.
Why this matters
This bitcoin story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on Bitcoin MagazineRelated market context
Binance-Controlled Korean Exchange GOPAX Stops Trading, Makes Users Email to Withdraw Crypto
Customers of GOPAX, a Korean exchange whose operator Streami is majority-owned by Binance, can now get crypto out only by emailing...
Conflux – Web3’s Next Billion Users
Why you should listen Most of crypto, Liang argues, competes for the same users and capital, moving them between chains with bridg...
Nigeria Erects Strict Stablecoin Wall, Demanding $11M Local Subsidiaries for US Dollar Tokens
Nigeria has adopted regulations for non-security virtual assets that make it one of the most restrictive stablecoin market-access...
China central bank probes Solana after Shanghai shutdown, report
China’s central bank has launched an investigation into Solana after authorities shut down an “illegal” promotional Solana event l...
Kalshi Users Pour $300 Million Into Stock Perps Within Hours of U.S. Debut
Kalshi, the CFTC-regulated prediction market, rolled out perpetual futures tied to individual U.S. stocks on Nov. 5 and said it is...
Binance Pulls Every SignalPlus API Key, Tells Users to Check Their Positions and Orders
Binance removed every API key linked to SignalPlus on Thursday, Nov. 5, saying SignalPlus had flagged a possible security problem....