SEC Extends Decision Deadline for Valkyrie Bitcoin ETF to 2022
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has delayed the deadline for a decision on the proposed Valkyrie Bitcoin Fund to January 7, 2022. “The Commission finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer period wit...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has delayed the deadline for a decision on the proposed Valkyrie Bitcoin Fund to January 7, 2022.
“The Commission finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer period within which to issue an order approving or disapproving the proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change and the issues raised in the comment letters that have been submitted,” the SEC said in a statement.
This is not the first time the Valkyrie Bitcoin Fund has faced a delay in the SEC’s approval period, which was most recently delayed in June of this year.
Financial services firm Valkyrie Funds LLC is at the crux of the United States’ recent pivot to Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), having gained approval for its Bitcoin futures ETF—the Valkyrie Bitcoin Strategy ETF—after the ProShares and VanEck futures ETFs first gained approval with the SEC.
The Valkyrie Bitcoin Fund, however, is a Bitcoin spot ETF, meaning it faces a different approval procedure from the SEC, and faces a different regulatory challenge.
The Valkyrie Bitcoin FundThe Valkyrie Bitcoin Fund is the company’s Bitcoin spot ETF, meaning the fund gives customers shares backed by the underlying asset—in this case, Bitcoin.
That is fundamentally different from futures ETFs like the Valkyrie Bitcoin Strategy ETF, which gives customers shares tied to a bundle of contracts to buy Bitcoin in the future.
Given the difference between the two, the Valkyrie Bitcoin Fund is facing a different road to potential approval than its futures counterpart.
https://twitter.com/jeffjohnroberts/status/1449060924128743426?s=20
When it comes to futures ETFs, the SEC operates on a “negative consent” model, which means a company’s futures ETF gains approval if the SEC doesn’t object to the product during the necessary time period.
Spot ETFs on the other hand, need affirmative approval from the SEC.
Why this matters
This bitcoin story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on DecryptRelated market context
Being right about Bitcoin won’t save your 3x leveraged ETF position
Bitcoin's next recovery could vindicate your investment thesis but leave your leveraged fund deep in the red, because the fund's d...
What Is Crypto Spot Trading?
For example, a token can be up 70% and still be a terrible trade if you have no idea when to take profits. Likewise, a 30% dip can...
Ether ETFs extend outflow streak to nine days as Solana funds snap record 14-week inflow run
Spot bitcoin, solana, and ether ETFs all logged weekly outflows following last week's trading, a notable shift for some of the fun...
Bitcoin spot ETFs see $21M in net inflows on October 9
The selective inflow into Bitcoin ETFs amid broader outflows suggests a cautious investor sentiment, highlighting Bitcoin's relati...
Bitcoin ETFs Shed $729M in Two Days as Investors Reverse Course
Bitcoin Magazine Bitcoin ETFs Shed $729M in Two Days as Investors Reverse Course U.S. investors this week reversed course, cashing...
Ethereum open interest rose 2.3% in ETH on Binance as its dollar value fell 6.6%
Ethereum open interest in Binance’s ETHUSDT futures contract was 2.27% higher in ETH on Thursday, Oct. 8, over the last 48 hours,...