ASX Shareholder Targets Former Directors in $14.4M CHESS Blockchain Fallout
Key Takeaways: Rosherville will be applying to court to sue former directors and officers of the ASX. The proposed action is related to the failed blockchain-based CHESS replacement. There are no allegations against the...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
Key Takeaways:
- Rosherville will be applying to court to sue former directors and officers of the ASX.
- The proposed action is related to the failed blockchain-based CHESS replacement.
- There are no allegations against the exchange itself, the stock exchange said in a statement.
User Score
8.7
Follow us on Google NewsA director and former officer of the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) is a shareholder who wants to once again raise concerns about its troubled blockchain initiative by filing a lawsuit against retired directors.
Rosherville Pty Ltd has advised the ASX of its plans to file a statutory derivative action in the Federal Court of Australia in copyright of ASX.
Shareholder Targets Former ASX LeadersRosherville’s proposed case would be brought under sections 236 and 237 of Australia’s Corporations Act 2001. The shareholder alleges that certain former ASX directors and officers breached their duties in connection with the previous CHESS replacement project.
ASX stressed that the allegations are not against ASX itself. The exchange also has not disclosed the names of the former officials involved or provided details of the specific conduct alleged by Rosherville.
The proposed action cannot proceed automatically. Rosherville must first convince the Federal Court that it should be allowed to bring proceedings on ASX’s behalf.
Read More: Australia Shuts Down 96 Crypto ATMs After Cryptolink Faces AML Reporting Crackdown
What Is a Statutory Derivative Action?A claim for a statutory action in the name of a company for an alleged wrong committed to the company.
The court must take into account a number of factors listed in Section 237 such as whether the applicant is pursuing the actions in good faith, whether the action is in the company’s best interests and whether there is a good cause to raise a serious question to be tried.
There is also a general requirement of writing notice to the company for at least 14 days prior to an application to court for leave.
Blockchain CHESS Project Behind the DisputeThe proposed case is about ASX’s prior attempt to replace its Clearing House Electronic Subregister System (CHESS) with a blockchain based system.
ASX started the process of replacing it in 2016, choosing distributed-ledger technology that it developed in conjunction with Digital Asset. The project was promoted as a major modernization of Australia’s financial-market infrastructure.
There were issues down the line. After an external review in November 2022 uncovered many of the proposed project’s shortcomings in design and fulfilling the exchange’s demands, ASX later suspended the project.
In 2023 the exchange dropped the blockchain-based strategy and started looking for other technology.
Read More: ASIC Warns Gen Z Crypto Traders as 23% Own Digital Assets Fueled by Social Media Hype
ASX Already Paid $14.4M PenaltyThe aborted project has already resulted in regulatory measures from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). ASIC had said that ASX had no basis to inform the market in February 2022 that the project is in good shape and still moving forward on the launch timeline.
ASX was found to have acted with misleading conduct related to the project and accepted that in 2026. The Federal Court then fined ASX for $14.4 million and directed it to contribute $2.1 million to the legal costs of ASIC.
That regulatory case is a different suit of derivative action than Rosherville’s proposal. The shareholder is only applying for permission to pursue claims against some of the former people, not against ASX.
ASX said it will continue updating the market as the matter develops under its continuous disclosure obligations.
The post ASX Shareholder Targets Former Directors in $14.4M CHESS Blockchain Fallout appeared first on CryptoNinjas.
Why this matters
Hyperliquid is showing up inside the Regulation theme, so this story is worth tracking for follow-through rather than treating it as a one-off headline.
Original source
Read on CryptoNinjasRelated market context
XRP Whales Dominate Exchange Outflows as Bitcoin Shorts Rise on Hyperliquid
The contrasting flows highlight a market where some large investors are moving XRP away from exchanges even as leveraged traders p...
‘Every single exchange’ will have to adopt public blockchain infrastructure to compete, Hyperliquid Policy Center CEO says
Chervinsky says that beyond regulated perps, onchain markets need to enter the U.S. regulatory perimeter, a step he expects will h...
Hyperliquid confirms Singapore base, but MAS says it is not the regulator
Hyperliquid's unregulated status in Singapore highlights the challenges and risks in the evolving decentralized finance landscape....
Binance leads SanDisk perps liquidity, with OKX and Hyperliquid trailing
Binance's dominance in SanDisk perps highlights the growing intersection of crypto and traditional securities, raising potential r...
Hyperliquid to add options to platform, enhancing derivatives offerings
Hyperliquid's expansion into options could significantly enhance its market position, driving user engagement and potentially boos...
Institutional capital is flowing into crypto, and Hyperliquid is capturing allocators’ attention
Institutional interest in crypto signals growing market legitimacy, potentially driving increased adoption and innovation in decen...