BaFin Clarifies Crypto Investments Are Not Protected by Deposit Insurance
The German financial market supervisor, the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) clarified on Monday that deposit insurance protection in the mainstream financial industry does not cover losses with cryptocurr...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
The German financial market supervisor, the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) clarified on Monday that deposit insurance protection in the mainstream financial industry does not cover losses with cryptocurrencies.
“BaFin now points out that crypto-assets do not fall under the protection of deposit insurance and, as a rule, the protection of investor compensation does not apply either,” the latest warning stated (translated from German).
In addition, the agency pointed out that existing insolvency laws in the country and the collapsed crypto company’s agreement with customers will determine the recovery of customers.
“The position of the customer is based on insolvency law, and, therefore, depends on whether there is a right of segregation after the design and implementation of the contractual relationship between the custodian and the customer,” the agency added.
Under the European Union law, customer deposits in the banks are protected by up to €100,000, which is a safety net that is not available to crypto companies.
The latest clarification came as an amendment to the existing warning of BaFin against crypto investments, which the regulator issued last February. Then, the German market supervisor termed crypto investments very risky.
Crypto Companies Going Under
The amendment and clarification came when the cryptocurrency industry is witnessing several abrupt bankruptcy filings. Celsius, Voyager Digital and a few others became insolvent. However, the normal recovery process for the customers is time-consuming: Mt. Gox creditors still did not receive their claims.
Meanwhile, several crypto companies made claims of being protected by the mainstream deposit protection schemes prompting regulators to debunk the misleading statements.
The US FDIC first warned Voyager Digital for falsely claiming customers to be protected by the US government and then send notices to a few other platforms, including the US arm of FTX, for similar statements.
This article was written by Arnab Shome at www.financemagnates.com.Why this matters
This cryptocurrency story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on Finance MagnatesRelated market context
Re Protocol Tops $400M in Deposits as Onchain Reinsurance Yield Attracts Capital
TL;DR: Re Protocol says deposits across its reUSD and reUSDe products have exceeded $400 million, putting a relatively unfamiliar...
Ripple-linked Uphold faces withdrawal delays amid ‘bank run’ claims
Crypto exchange Uphold delayed many withdrawal requests this month, spooking customers and inciting social media criticism against...
Securitize Plans River One Acquisition to Connect Stablecoin Capital With Asset-Backed Finance
TL;DR: Securitize has announced an agreement to acquire River One as it looks to connect tokenized capital with traditional asset-...
EU Seeks Experts to Help Set Tokenisation Standards as Financial Markets Move Onchain
TL;DR: European authorities are inviting nominations for a new Tokenisation Standards Group, with applications due on November 27....
Coinbase, Kalshi and Other Firms Back CFTC in Fight Over Stock Perpetuals
A dispute over who may regulate perpetual futures linked to individual US stocks is drawing some of crypto’s most prominent compan...
MARA Sells 13,597 Bitcoin for $1.1B as Its AI Pivot Reshapes Treasury Strategy
MARA has put a sizeable number on the changing economics of Bitcoin mining. In its third-quarter shareholder letter, the company s...