BlackRock argues SEC has no grounds to treat crypto futures and spot ETFs differently
BlackRock questioned the SEC's preference for the 1940 Act that oversees futures ETFs, and argued that it lacks relevancy to both crypto-spot and crypto-futures ETFs.
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
BlackRock questioned the SEC's preference for the 1940 Act that oversees futures ETFs, and argued that it lacks relevancy to both crypto-spot and crypto-futures ETFs.
Why this matters
This cryptocurrency story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on CointelegraphRelated market context
Spot Bitcoin ETFs shed $643 million in a day as Ethereum funds lose $156 million
The significant outflows from Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs highlight investor sensitivity to market disruptions, potentially impactin...
Bitcoin ETFs Add $423M in 3 Days as Blackrock Leads
Bitcoin ETFs attracted $137.33 million on Wednesday, extending their inflow streak to three sessions and lifting week-to-date addi...
Franklin Templeton Officially Launches 2 Bitcoin DRIP ETFs That Turn Dividends Into Bitcoin
Bitcoin Magazine Franklin Templeton Officially Launches 2 Bitcoin DRIP ETFs That Turn Dividends Into Bitcoin Two Nasdaq-listed fun...
Franklin Templeton’s Dividend-to-Bitcoin ETFs Open on Nasdaq With About $72,000 in Trades
Franklin Templeton’s FBEQ and FIBT, two ETFs whose indexes reinvest their companies’ dividends in bitcoin, drew about $72,000 of t...
US Bitcoin ETFs attract $137M, Ether funds see $21M outflows
The contrasting flows in Bitcoin and Ether ETFs highlight shifting investor preferences, impacting market dynamics and fund strate...
Lummis argues Clarity Act would classify Binance as a covered person
The Clarity Act's failure may hinder regulatory advancements in digital assets, potentially allowing continued exploitation of cry...