Floki Inu (FLOKI) Claps Back: Counters Bitget’s Claim Of Breaching 7-Day Listing Deadline
Recently, the cryptocurrency community has witnessed a heated dispute between the protocol Floki Inu (FLOKI) and the crypto exchange Bitget. The controversy arose following Bitget’s listing of TokenFi (TOKEN) and subsequ...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
Recently, the cryptocurrency community has witnessed a heated dispute between the protocol Floki Inu (FLOKI) and the crypto exchange Bitget.
The controversy arose following Bitget’s listing of TokenFi (TOKEN) and subsequent accusations of market manipulation, unauthorized listing, and insufficient solvency.
Bitget Faces Allegations Of Market ManipulationOn October 27, 2023, Bitget announced the listing of TokenFi (TOKEN) in the Innovation Zone of its Spot market. Shortly after the trading service for TokenFi commenced, significant price fluctuations were observed, prompting suspicions of market manipulation.
Concerns were further raised when it was discovered that TokenFi’s project team had contributed less than $2,000 worth of tokens to the liquidity pool of decentralized exchanges (DEXes), suggesting potential manipulation of initial liquidity.
Moreover, an investigation of the TokenFi project uncovered additional issues, including an “opaque” token economy and an unclear vesting schedule.
In light of these findings and to safeguard their users, Bitget decided to delist TokenFi (TOKEN) and initiated a buyback plan for users who held the token on its platform.
Floki Inu, responded strongly to the exchange’s actions, alleging that Bitget had violated their agreement not to list TOKEN until seven days after its launch.
The meme coin protocol claimed to have had conversations with “several Tier 1 exchanges” and respected parties in the cryptocurrency industry. While these exchanges had expressed interest in listing TOKEN earlier, they agreed to honor Floki Inu’s request to wait for the stipulated period.
However, Bitget, which, according to Floki Inu, was “the smallest exchange” among those involved, allegedly announced the listing of a fake version of the TOKEN token just 12 minutes before the official launch on the blockchain.
Floki Inu further asserted that Bitget had engaged in “deceptive trading practices,” manipulating TOKEN’s volume without evidence of holding the actual tokens.
The protocol alleges that Bitget’s initial announcement had even stated that withdrawals would open 24 hours after trading began, potentially indicating an attempt to manipulate the token’s price. However, the market response did not align with Bitget’s expectations, resulting in a significant financial loss.
The situation escalated when users began reporting difficulties in withdrawing TOKEN from Bitget’s platform, with some users allegedly being banned for complaints. Floki Inu claimed to have contacted Bitget to address the issue, but the response was unsatisfactory, including a request to report liquidity issues to Bitget’s support team.
Floki Inu Alleges Bad FaithFollowing subsequent discussions between Floki Inu and Bitget, it was revealed that Bitget required up to 1 billion TokenFi tokens to meet user withdrawal demands and cover their financial deficit. According to Floki’s response, this amounted to approximately 10% of TokenFi’s total supply, equivalent to around $20 million at the time of Bidget’s statement.
Furthermore, the protocol accused Bitget of acting in “bad faith” and attempting to resolve the situation through an over-the-counter (OTC) deal at a deeply discounted rate.
The proposed discount of 90% from the market price raised concerns, as it was argued that Bitget should bear the responsibility for its actions and the resulting financial shortfall.
In response to Bitget’s announcement of delisting TokenFi and accusations of market manipulation, Floki Inu disputed the claims made by Bitget. They asserted that Bitget had listed the token against their explicit instructions and falsely accused the Floki Inu team of price manipulation.
Floki also challenged Bitget to provide verifiable evidence of their TOKEN and FLOKI holdings, expressing concerns about Bitget’s overall solvency and risk management practices.
Ultimately, the protocol cautioned its users against trading or holding FLOKI on Bitget, citing the “troubling patterns” witnessed during the TokenFi incident. As the situation develops, the cryptocurrency community awaits further clarification and resolution regarding the allegations and the impact on affected users.
Given these developments, FLOKI has experienced a retracement of over 9% in the past 24 hours and is currently trading at $0.00003250. Nonetheless, the token has seen an impressive 85% increase over the past fourteen days.
Featured image from Shutterstock, chart from TradingView.com
Why this matters
This cryptocurrency story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on NewsBTCRelated market context
Binance Details $6.3B Hot-Wallet Breach as Exchange Pledges to Cover Losses
TL;DR: The company reported approximately $3 billion of affected assets frozen on-chain through coordination with issuers, investi...
Uniswap Opens TJAR Fee Conversion Beyond Protocol as Robinhood Joins
TL;DR: Searchers compete to exchange the chosen payout token for assets accumulated in the jar. Open searcher competition does not...
Uber Tests Tokenized Money Funds to Unlock 24/7 Trading Yield
The ride-sharing giant used a tokenized money market fund to earn 1.5 days more yield on its investment by selling the assets on S...
Chainlink Unveils 24/7 Pricing for Tokenized Assets as Aave Adopts Feeds
TL;DR: The service extends a prior 24/5 equity-data product into weekends and holidays. An oracle feed is not a guarantee of a red...
Tether-Backed FASE Foundation Targets Scams and Stablecoin Aid
TL;DR: Named founding stakeholders include Anchorage Digital, Bybit, Chainalysis, Payward, Opera and the Solana Foundation; the Un...
Hanwha Chooses Chainlink Data and CCIP for Global Tokenization Platform
TL;DR: The proposal covers more than representing an asset with an on-chain token. A strategic partnership does not establish that...