BlackRock And Big Players Could Take Over Bitcoin Mining
It has been just revealed that a terrible warning is floating above the crypto space. Bitcoin mining could be taken over by BlackRock and the big players. Check out the latest reports about this really worrisome claim. B...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
It has been just revealed that a terrible warning is floating above the crypto space. Bitcoin mining could be taken over by BlackRock and the big players. Check out the latest reports about this really worrisome claim.
BlackRock and big players could take over BTC miningAccording to Bloomberg’s crypto market analyst, Jamie Coutts, Bitcoin (BTC) might be vulnerable to being taken over by the powerhouses of the traditional financial system.
Coutts shared data on social media platform X, revealing that BlackRock, the world’s biggest asset manager, began gaining proxy exposure to Bitcoin in 2020 by purchasing shares of mining company Marathon Digital.
He suggests that BlackRock’s move may have been a precursor to its recent application for a Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF).
Coutts notes that BlackRock and other large investors like Vanguard and StateStreet, who prioritize environmental, social and governance (ESG)-driven investing principles, started purchasing public mining stock in 2020.
BlackRock began investing in Marathon Digital three years ago when hostility towards mining was high, possibly due to the industry’s heavy reliance on fossil fuels at the time.
According to an analyst, the world’s largest asset managers have become the leading investors in the three biggest publicly traded Bitcoin miners, holding about 8.9% of all hash power.
This institutionalization of Bitcoin may present new challenges, as the larger players may not share the same goals and interests as the smaller entities.
While a “51% attack,” where one or multiple actors control most of the hash rate, is unlikely, there may be a risk of creeping influence that goes against the values of the network. However, this should not be interpreted as FUD as the online publication the Daily Hodl notes.
“This conflict could involve misaligned ESG objectives or potential censorship of transactions. Neither would prevent the chain from operating; other miners could process censored transactions (while collecting the fees).
But, given the activist tendencies of these big asset managers, it remains unclear if their intentions toward Bitcoin miners will be passive in nature.”
Why this matters
This mining story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on CryptoGazetteRelated market context
$72.3B Bitcoin Giant Strategy Fuels Fresh Buy Rumors with Saylor’s Latest Post
Key Takeaways: Michael Saylor raised speculations following the “More orange than ever” post accompanied by the Strategy Bitcoin a...
Wells Fargo Reportedly Talking With Kraken Parent Payward to Source Crypto Trading Liquidity
Wells Fargo is in discussions with Payward, the company that operates the Kraken exchange, about a deal that would have Payward su...
Greece plans 10% capital gains tax on crypto in first digital asset framework
Greece's crypto tax framework enhances predictability for investors, aligning with EU standards and potentially influencing broade...
BlackRock ETF clients pull $116.05 million from Ethereum fund
Investor reallocation from Ethereum to Bitcoin ETFs suggests shifting confidence and potential volatility amid changing macroecono...
Grayscale Adds BitGo To Hyperliquid Staking ETF Custody Setup
TL;DR: Grayscale has added BitGo Bank & Trust as an additional custodian for a portion of the HYPE held by its Hyperliquid Staking...
Blockchain and digital asset news outlet Cointelegraph explores sale: Report
Cointelegraph's traffic collapse highlights the risks of SEO penalties, impacting brand value and posing challenges for potential...