THORChain refuses to block Bitget funds, despite pausing after own hack
DeFi project THORChain has turned down a formal plea to “refuse service” to addresses associated with the recent hack of Bitget, a centralized crypto exchange which lost over $380 million on Thursday night. The decision...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
DeFi project THORChain has turned down a formal plea to “refuse service” to addresses associated with the recent hack of Bitget, a centralized crypto exchange which lost over $380 million on Thursday night.
The decision comes four months after THORChain halted trading after it was hacked for $10 million.
In the aftermath of Thursday’s hack, Bitget CEO Gracy Chen called it “highly consistent with known patterns of North Korean hacker organizations,” after on-chain analysts spotted connections to wallets used following previously attributed hacks.
Our attacker addresses are publicly listed and actively tracked. We are formally asking @THORChain to refuse service to these addresses. Decentralization is a design principle, not a shield for facilitating known stolen funds.
The industry is watching. https://t.co/rOzV9kpu0F
Read more: Bitget’s eighth birthday ends with a $352M hack
Both Chen and blockchain security firm SlowMist, which is supporting Bitget with tracing the stolen funds, appealed to THORChain, with the latter urging that “decentralization should not become a blanket excuse when dealing with known stolen funds.”
Addressing the calls to take action, THORChain said it was “devastated to hear” of Bitget’s hack, but that it is “decentralized and permissionless.”
It compared itself to “Bitcoin, Ethereum, and BNB Chain,” asking if those networks would be expected to halt when stolen funds passed through them.
Notably, following a $600 million hack in 2022, BNB Chain validators did indeed halt the chain, preventing the attacker from extracting the majority of the loot.
We are devasted to hear about the recent exploit and can imagine how difficult this must be for everyone involved.
THORChain is decentralized and permissionless like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and BNB Chain.
What responsibility should Bitcoin, Ethereum, and BNB Chain bear when… https://t.co/ArvP6N1w3F
Read more: Explained: How $600M was stolen from Binance’s BNB chain
THORChain’s refusal is widely seen as hypocritical considering its validators previously took swift action to halt trading in response to being hacked itself for approximately $10 million back in May.
Revisiting the episode, THORChain has stressed the halt was to protect the protocol, it never selectively blacklisted the hacker, and that it “doesn’t censor by design.”
According to THORChain’s own analytics page, the protocol processed a total of $678 million in the two days following the Bitget hack, compared to $20 million to $60 million daily volume in the week preceding it.
Consequently, it generated a total of almost $1.2 million in “gross system income” over those same two days.
THORChain’s track recordTHORChain swaps have been a hacker favorite for some time, and were most notably used to move the majority of the $1.5 billion hacked from ByBit in February last year.
That incident was also linked to North Korean hackers from the so-called “TraderTraitor” operation.
Following the theft, a similar discussion opened up, and a former THORChain developer known as “Pluto” left the project in response.
Similarly, volume spiked immediately following April’s $280 million Kelp DAO hack, as Specter, the investigator who made the North Korean connection in the Bitget case, pointed out in their Telegram group.
Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.
The post THORChain refuses to block Bitget funds, despite pausing after own hack appeared first on Protos.
Why this matters
BNB is showing up inside the Security Incidents theme, so this story is worth tracking for follow-through rather than treating it as a one-off headline.
Original source
Read on ProtosRelated market context
Crypto trader Frogman hacked for over $4 million during TOKEN2049
The incident underscores the persistent security vulnerabilities in crypto trading, highlighting the need for enhanced protective...
Crypto liquidations hit $608 million as Ether longs unwind, with a $26.64 million hit on Binance
The liquidation event highlights the volatility and risk in crypto markets, emphasizing the need for cautious leverage management...
S&P brings ratings-style scrutiny to $10 billion crypto vault market as $6 million Base incident exposes risks
S&P Global is bringing ratings-style risk assessments to crypto lending vaults as the fast-growing market confronts fresh security...
Ethereum holds near $2,700 as $414.1 million in longs sit in liquidation zones
Ethereum trades near $2,700 as $148.3 million in crypto positions are liquidated and $414.1 million in ETH longs sit in liquidatio...
Pudgy Penguins’ parent firm shuts down its own blockchain
Pudgy Penguins’ parent company, Igloo Inc, announced the shutdown of Abstract Chain after “losing tens of millions of dollars over...
Why Abstract is killing its Ethereum L2 instead of launching a token to save it
Abstract will shut down on Dec. 15 despite onboarding more than 400,000 users, hosting 144 apps, and landing brands including Disn...