We discussed the challenges of crypto taxation, the impending impact of the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF), recent tax policy shifts in Denmark, Japan, and Italy, and what the future holds for investors and regulators alike.

Interviewer: Florian, thank you for joining us today. There’s been a lot of discussion recently about substantial tax changes in the global crypto tax landscape. Let’s start with Denmark, which is moving toward taxing unrealized crypto gains. Denmark already has some of the highest taxes in the world for Bitcoin. What could be their justification for this approach?

Florian Wimmer: Thanks for having me. Denmark’s move is indeed significant and quite aggressive. Taxing unrealized gains means that investors have to pay taxes on the increase in value of their crypto assets each year, even if they haven’t sold them. This is unprecedented in the crypto world and goes beyond how most traditional assets are taxed.

Interviewer: Due to Denmark’s high Bitcoin taxes, do you think this move will harm the industry?

Florian Wimmer: Absolutely. Such stringent tax policies could have several unintended consequences. High taxes on unrealized gains could discourage individual investors and crypto-related businesses from operating in Denmark. Investors might relocate to countries with more favorable tax regimes, leading to capital flight. Startups and tech talent could also move elsewhere.

Moreover, the administrative burden of calculating and reporting taxes on unrealized gains could be substantial, especially given crypto’s price volatility. This complexity might deter participation in the crypto market altogether or push activities underground, making regulation and oversight even more challenging.

Interviewer: Could Denmark’s policy set a precedent for other countries considering similar measures?

Florian Wimmer: It’s possible. If Denmark implements this policy and significantly generates tax revenue without severely impacting their economy, other countries might view it as a viable option. However, it’s also risky. Aggressive taxation can drive away investment, harming the crypto economy in the long run.

Interviewer: Last week, we saw that Japan’s Democratic Party for the People proposed reducing crypto tax rates, and Italy is considering increasing its crypto capital gains. What are your thoughts on these contrasting approaches?

Florian Wimmer: Crypto is political now, and the shifts we see are impactful. Imagine if any other asset class experienced such drastic swings in tax policy. Communities and investors need more stability than that.

By promising such a substantial tax discount, Japan’s Democratic Party aims to cater to a mass of indignant voters who see Japan’s crypto taxes—as high as 55%—as excessively burdensome. Japan ranks with Denmark among the top countries for high crypto tax, and there aren’t many places where more than half of your Bitcoin profits can be taken away. The Democrats view this in Japan as a winning strategy to attract votes. Whether this will translate into actual policy remains to be seen, but this signal impacts the community and influences investors’ behavior.

Italy’s proposal to increase the crypto capital gains tax to 42% could have the opposite effect. It risks stifling innovation and could lead to a “brain drain,” with investors and companies relocating to more crypto-friendly jurisdictions like Switzerland, where capital gains are not taxed. These massive discrepancies and abrupt policy changes create instability and could decrease tax revenue as capital and talent leave the country.

Interviewer: You commented on these developments on social media. Could you share more about your perspective?

Florian Wimmer: Certainly. The crypto community is very responsive to such policy changes. In Italy, the proposed tax increase has sparked significant debate. Industry leaders fear a 61% jump in capital gains tax could push the industry towards evasion rather than promoting compliance. It might suffocate innovation and drive businesses out of the country.

In Japan, many in the industry have welcomed the potential tax cuts. However, given the current political landscape, it’s uncertain whether these proposals will come to fruition. Regardless, these discussions are meaningful as they highlight the need for thoughtful regulation that balances governmental revenue needs with the health and growth of the crypto sector.

Interviewer: You mentioned the importance of international coordination. How does the upcoming implementation of the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) fit into this picture?

Florian Wimmer: CARF represents a significant step towards global standardization in crypto tax reporting. Starting in 2026, Crypto-Asset Service Providers in 48 countries will be required to collect and report detailed transaction data. This increased transparency will make tax evasion more difficult and encourage compliance.

Attention to tax obligations will carry more significant risks for investors and businesses. Compliance is not optional, and tools and services that facilitate accurate reporting will become essential. At Blockpit, we’re preparing for this shift by enhancing our software to meet these new requirements.

Interviewer: With low compliance rates among crypto traders, how do you see CARF affecting them?

Florian Wimmer: We anticipate a significant increase in compliance rates once CARF is implemented. The framework will empower tax authorities with better data, leading to more audits and enforcement actions. Investors neglecting their tax obligations may face hefty fines or even legal consequences.

This shift will likely push more traders to seek compliant solutions and professional advice. Compliance rates could rise to 50% or higher as global enforcement intensifies. It’s a wake-up call for the industry to take tax obligations seriously.

Interviewer: Florian, thank you for sharing your valuable insights on these pressing issues in the crypto world.

Florian Wimmer: Thank you. It’s been a pleasure discussing these developments.

This is a sponsored article. Opinions expressed are solely those of the sponsor and readers should conduct their own due diligence before taking any action based on information presented in this article.