Ripple Executive Criticizes SEC’s Handling of Crypto Regulation
Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, has delivered a scathing critique of Gurbir Grewal, the Director of Enforcement at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), regarding comments made about the compliance...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, has delivered a scathing critique of Gurbir Grewal, the Director of Enforcement at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), regarding comments made about the compliance efforts within the crypto industry.
During a recent SEC event, Grewal suggested that the burgeoning crypto sector was employing various tactics to circumvent regulatory oversight, such as relocating or registering in different jurisdictions. He also addressed concerns regarding the SEC’s regulatory approach, refuting allegations of overreach and exceeding its regulatory mandate.
Alderoty, however, highlighted the inconsistencies in Grewal’s remarks, pointing out instances where the SEC had potentially overstepped its bounds and abused its authority. He specifically mentioned the DebtBox sanctions for “gross abuse of power,” a Ripple judge’s criticism for lacking “faithful allegiance to the law,” and the “arbitrary and capricious” ruling in the Grayscale case.
Moreover, Alderoty criticized the SEC’s erratic application of the Howey test, a standard used to determine whether certain transactions qualify as investment contracts. He noted that the SEC’s guidance on the Howey test, still present on its website, fluctuates arbitrarily, leading to confusion and inconsistency within the industry.
According to Alderoty, the SEC must address these concerns to restore credibility and trust. He urged the regulator to acknowledge and rectify the institutional damage inflicted by its approach to crypto regulation, emphasizing the necessity for enhanced transparency and accountability.
In conclusion, Alderoty emphasized that if the SEC genuinely aims to mend the institutional harm caused during what he termed as a “misguided war on crypto,” it must confront these truths and adopt a more responsible and balanced regulatory stance.
Featured Image: Freepik
Why this matters
This altcoin story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on CryptoCurrencyNewsRelated market context
JPMorgan Cuts Polymarket Banking Ties Amid Regulatory Concerns and $20B Valuation
Key Takeaways: In October 2025, JPMorgan apparently broke its ties with Polymarket because of regulatory issues. Since then, Polym...
From MiCA to GENIUS: Why Crypto's Next Regulatory Test Is Cross-Border Coordination
The central debate in digital asset policy used to be whether to regulate at all. That question is now settled. MiCA's transitiona...
JPMorgan Debanked Polymarket Over US Regulatory Concerns
JPMorgan severed its links with Polymarket last year, citing regulatory concerns as the prediction market industry stood on shakie...
JPMorgan cuts banking ties with Polymarket over regulatory concerns
JPMorgan's cautious stance highlights the growing tension between traditional finance and emerging platforms navigating regulatory...
Trump to Join $1 Trillion Crypto and Prediction Markets Meeting at White House
Key Takeaways: Senior executives in the crypto and prediction markets will come to the White House on Aug. 19 to see President Don...
SEC Cancels Friday Meeting to Propose Regulation Crypto, Innovation Exemption Also Facing Delays
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission called off the open meeting at which it planned to propose Regulation Crypto, its firs...