Why One Solana Validator Voted Against Increasing Priority Fees
The validator says the proposal only fixes half the problem and others say removing the burn function will make SOL inflationary.
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
Why this matters
This altcoin story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on DecryptRelated market context
XRP Ledger Reviews Two Token-Authorization Fixes Ahead of Any Validator Vote
TL;DR: Two open XRP Ledger proposals address authorization checks for liquidity-pool tokens and existing trust-line balances. The...
Anchorpoint Plans Native HKDAP on Solana as Hong Kong Dollar Access Expands
TL;DR Anchorpoint announced its Solana collaboration on October 30. Native minting and redemption are planned capabilities. The is...
Crypto investigators flag suspected $106M theft, $786K Solana bot drain
A European entity may have lost $106 million from exchange accounts, while a wallet associated with a Solana arbitrage bot may hav...
Binance May Have Lost Around Half of 5-Year Profits to Fines and Hacks: Analysis
Binance’s “cost of doing business,” including fines and hack losses, could equal more than half of the largest crypto exchange’s e...
Solana Labs opens applications for Incubator Cohort 6
Solana Labs' incubator fosters innovation by supporting diverse teams, potentially accelerating Web3 and Web2 integration into the...
Solana’s monthly stablecoin card spending hits record $141 million in October
Solana's rising stablecoin card spending highlights growing crypto adoption, but reliance on few issuers poses potential concentra...