Basel Committee Finalizes Policy Suggesting 2% Bitcoin Exposure Cap For Banks
The BIS’ Basel Committee introduced a finalized proposal for limits to the amount of Tier 1 capital banks can hold in bitcoin.The Bank for International Settlements' (BIS) Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has final...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
The BIS’ Basel Committee introduced a finalized proposal for limits to the amount of Tier 1 capital banks can hold in bitcoin.
The Bank for International Settlements' (BIS) Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has finalized a proposed policy that would place a 2% limit on banks' Tier 1 capital held in bitcoin. This comes with an endorsement from the Group of Central Bank Governors and Heads of Supervision (GHOS), the oversight body of the Basel Committee, which is the “primary global standard setter for the prudential regulation of banks.”
Investopedia defines Tier 1 capital as “the core capital held in a bank's reserves [that] is used to fund business activities for the bank's clients. It includes common stock, as well as disclosed reserves and certain other assets.”
The policy includes bitcoin in its definition of Group 2 crypto assets, saying that “In addition to any tokenised traditional assets and stablecoins that fail the classification conditions, Group 2 includes all unbacked cryptoassets.” It later describes that “a bank’s total exposure to Group 2 cryptoassets should not generally be higher than 1% of the bank’s Tier 1 capital and must not exceed 2% of the bank’s Tier 1 capital.”
The BIS had previously considered a policy of 1% for global banks. In turn, the banks requested a 5% reserve limit. This 2% appears to be a compromise between the two. According to data from 2020, if applied to all banks in the world, who collectively custody approximately $180 trillion, this would amount to a limit of $3.6 trillion in bitcoin held by such entities.
Tiff Macklem, Chair of the GHOS, stated that “Today's endorsement by the GHOS marks an important milestone in developing a global regulatory baseline for mitigating risks to banks from cryptoassets. It is important to continue to monitor bank-related developments in cryptoasset markets. We remain ready to act further if necessary.”
Why this matters
This bitcoin story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on Bitcoin MagazineRelated market context
Banks are building the rails to profit from 13.9 million BTC they do not own
Strategy's new Bitcoin Banking Adoption Index gives 25 major banks and financial institutions an overall 32% score based on activi...
Capital Group’s growth ETF adds $8M in Strategy shares, bringing total stake to 1.66M
Capital Group's significant investment in MicroStrategy highlights institutional interest in Bitcoin exposure through regulated se...
EthSystems targets banks with blockchain privacy technology from Ethereum Foundation spinout
EthSystems' blockchain privacy tech could accelerate Ethereum's adoption in banking, potentially transforming global financial sys...
CLARITY Act faces pressure from 78 US banking groups over stablecoin rules
The opposition highlights potential instability in the banking sector and could delay regulatory clarity for stablecoins, affectin...
Banking groups urge Senate to amend Clarity Act’s stablecoin provisions
Banking sector resistance to stablecoin provisions may delay the Clarity Act, impacting regulatory progress and traditional bankin...
How the Fed’s balance sheet unwind could squeeze banks and rattle crypto markets
The Fed's QT could destabilize banks, tighten credit, and impact crypto markets, highlighting the risks of shifting liquidity dyna...