Neal Katyal Argues For Bitcoin Regulation
At Bitcoin 2022, Constitutional lawyer Neal Katyal argued that Bitcoiners should be open to some regulation to ultimately protect the technology.As one of the world’s most lauded outlines of basic human freedoms and prol...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
At Bitcoin 2022, Constitutional lawyer Neal Katyal argued that Bitcoiners should be open to some regulation to ultimately protect the technology.
As one of the world’s most lauded outlines of basic human freedoms and prolific examples of consensus-enforced governing, the U.S. Constitution is often pointed to as a spiritual predecessor of the freedoms and equity promised by Bitcoin.
Emphasizing and challenging these parallels, Georgetown University Law Professor Neal Katyal and Justin Wales, the head of legal for North America at bitcoin exchange Crypto.com, addressed Bitcoin 2022 attendees in a discussion titled “The U.S. Constitution And Bitcoin.”
"I love Bitcoin, I love all you and you guys see something really important and I want to help tell your story," Katyal told the crowd. “I don't think that right now Washington... has a handle on how important these technologies [like Bitcoin] are to our economy, to our national security."
Wales pressed Katyal on whether or not there is a Constitutional case to be made for the fundamental right to commit bitcoin transactions. While Katyal acknowledged that using Bitcoin has some overlap with free speech rights, he clarified that he does not think there’s a strong Constitutional case to be made there.
“At its core, I view Bitcoin as a democratic tool,” Wales explained at one point, adding context to the questions he was posing for Katyal. “It says we, as a community, want to opt out of a system that is governed completely by a federal fiat monetary system."
But, while Katyal seemed to agree that the power to transact outside of the fiat monetary rails is a critical freedom granted by Bitcoin, he indicated that Bitcoiners are unlikely to convince Constitutional courts that the space should be free from regulation.
"I think it's gonna be hard to say that bitcoin transactions are protected by the first amendment [of the Constitution],” Katyal said. “My central message to everyone today is I think we need to be telling the story for why some regulation in the space is OK. Because if we don’t … I think that’s an unlikely winner.”
Bitcoin 2022 is part of the Bitcoin Event Series hosted by BTC Inc, the parent company of Bitcoin Magazine.
Why this matters
This bitcoin story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on Bitcoin MagazineRelated market context
MetaMask Exits Ethereum Validators After Security Incident Hits Staking Infrastructure
Key Takeaways: MetaMask is addressing a security incident to its infrastructure of which it is unaware. According to the company,...
Circle urges EU to rethink stablecoin reserve rules in MiCA review
Circle's proposal could reshape EU stablecoin regulations, potentially enhancing financial stability and fostering cross-border in...
Ethereum Foundation Launches Privacy Tool That Cuts the Link Between AI Prompts and Payers
The Ethereum Foundation has launched zkAPI, a system for paying for AI models and other metered online services without that usage...
Authors Withdraw Ethereum Staking Reward Burn Plan From Hegota Upgrade, Seek Separate Process
A proposal to burn a growing share of Ethereum staking rewards will not be part of the network’s Hegota upgrade. Ethereum France p...
Ethereum unstaking queue surges 392% since October start
The surge in Ethereum unstaking highlights potential vulnerabilities in staking infrastructure and could influence future staking...
Ethereum Now Lets You Pay for AI Without Revealing Who You Are
Ethereum's zkAPI lets users prepay in USDC and query AI models through cryptographic proofs, so no single party sees both who they...