PayPal Fines Up To $2,500 For Intolerance: Bitcoin Fixes This
The User Agreement lays out terms and conditions for services users are allowed to use with funds from PayPal, allowing the censoring of its customers’ money.PayPal has a fine in place for “intolerance” for up to $2,500...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
The User Agreement lays out terms and conditions for services users are allowed to use with funds from PayPal, allowing the censoring of its customers’ money.
PayPal has a fine in place for “intolerance” for up to $2,500 embedded into its terms and conditions.
Located in PayPal’s User Agreement, the company states:
“You acknowledge and agree that $2,500.00 U.S. dollars per violation of the Acceptable Use Policy is presently a reasonable minimum estimate of PayPal’s actual damages.”
The Acceptable Use Policy includes a clause that warns against “the promotion of hate, violence, racial or other forms of intolerance that is discriminatory or the financial exploitation of a crime, [and] items that are considered obscene.”
Specifically, PayPal is saying that you cannot use its services in order to pay for anything that results in any of the criteria listed above. However, the issue that can result in such an attempt aimed at the censorship or one’s own money is that the ideas of “intolerance” and “items that are considered obscene” could arguably be considered subjective.
Thus, PayPal positions itself as the arbitrator of what is the proper way to use funds that do not belong to the company. In doing so, the company creates echoes of criticism surrounding China’s development of its central bank digital currency (CBDC), the digital yuan.
Critics of China’s CBDC cite concerns of the nation-state’s ability to control what residents can and cannot choose to spend their money on, and paired with China’s social credit system which can serve as a blacklist for unapproved behavior, the criticism is easily understandable.
Bitcoin cannot be censored in the way that China can control its CBDC, or in the way PayPal tries to censor services its customers are permitted to use. Bitcoin is the antithesis of financial censorship.
Why this matters
This bitcoin story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on Bitcoin MagazineRelated market context
China’s Prosecutors Move to Treat Crypto Mixers as Evidence of Money Laundering
Bitcoin Magazine China’s Prosecutors Move to Treat Crypto Mixers as Evidence of Money Laundering China’s Supreme People’s Procurat...
Coinbase opens account registration for users in China
Coinbase's move could signal a shift in global crypto market dynamics, potentially challenging China's strict regulatory stance on...
Kraken API Partner Program: xStocks, the asset class your users are already asking for
TL;DR xStocks are tokenized U.S. equities, backed 1:1 by the underlying stock, available to partners through Kraken’s existing spo...
Trump Pushes CLARITY Act, Warns China Could Dominate Crypto and AI in High-Stakes Race
Key Takeaways: Donald Trump urged the U.S. Senate to pass the CLARITY Act, calling it vital for America’s future. China is vying w...
Starknet Memory Protocol Draft Puts User-Owned AI Data On The Crypto Agenda
Starknet Memory Protocol Draft Puts User-Owned AI Data On The Crypto Agenda is a useful reminder that crypto coverage is not only...
Banks are building the rails to profit from 13.9 million BTC they do not own
Strategy's new Bitcoin Banking Adoption Index gives 25 major banks and financial institutions an overall 32% score based on activi...