SEC Extends Decision Deadline for Valkyrie Bitcoin ETF to 2022
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has delayed the deadline for a decision on the proposed Valkyrie Bitcoin Fund to January 7, 2022. “The Commission finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer period wit...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has delayed the deadline for a decision on the proposed Valkyrie Bitcoin Fund to January 7, 2022.
“The Commission finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer period within which to issue an order approving or disapproving the proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change and the issues raised in the comment letters that have been submitted,” the SEC said in a statement.
This is not the first time the Valkyrie Bitcoin Fund has faced a delay in the SEC’s approval period, which was most recently delayed in June of this year.
Financial services firm Valkyrie Funds LLC is at the crux of the United States’ recent pivot to Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), having gained approval for its Bitcoin futures ETF—the Valkyrie Bitcoin Strategy ETF—after the ProShares and VanEck futures ETFs first gained approval with the SEC.
The Valkyrie Bitcoin Fund, however, is a Bitcoin spot ETF, meaning it faces a different approval procedure from the SEC, and faces a different regulatory challenge.
The Valkyrie Bitcoin FundThe Valkyrie Bitcoin Fund is the company’s Bitcoin spot ETF, meaning the fund gives customers shares backed by the underlying asset—in this case, Bitcoin.
That is fundamentally different from futures ETFs like the Valkyrie Bitcoin Strategy ETF, which gives customers shares tied to a bundle of contracts to buy Bitcoin in the future.
Given the difference between the two, the Valkyrie Bitcoin Fund is facing a different road to potential approval than its futures counterpart.
https://twitter.com/jeffjohnroberts/status/1449060924128743426?s=20
When it comes to futures ETFs, the SEC operates on a “negative consent” model, which means a company’s futures ETF gains approval if the SEC doesn’t object to the product during the necessary time period.
Spot ETFs on the other hand, need affirmative approval from the SEC.
Why this matters
This bitcoin story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on DecryptRelated market context
SEC Opens Comment Period On Cboe 3x Bitcoin And Ethereum ETF Proposal
The SEC has opened a public comment period on Cboe BZX Exchange’s proposal to list six daily 3x leveraged Bitcoin and Ethereum fut...
The US approved high-leverage Bitcoin trading while crypto founders remain legally blocked from raising funds
On May 29, the CFTC approved a Bitcoin perpetual contract for a regulated US exchange. Almost three months later, on Aug. 18, the...
Hashdex Liquidates DEFI As First US Spot Bitcoin ETF Closure Arrives
Hashdex has begun liquidating its Hashdex Bitcoin ETF, ticker DEFI, marking the first closure of a US spot Bitcoin ETF since the c...
Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs just had their biggest week of 2026 as crypto exploded higher
US spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs recorded their strongest inflow week of 2026 as a sharp crypto rally pulled investors back into...
Canary Files Fourth Staked TRX ETF Amendment With 1.10% Fee
Canary Capital has filed Amendment No. 4 to its registration statement for the Canary Staked TRX ETF, giving investors more detail...
Bitcoin miner IPO demands 99.8% of funds from public buyers while handing them just 10% equity
Bitari Inc., a Bitcoin mining host pursuing a planned Bitcoin mining IPO and Nasdaq listing, is asking public buyers to provide ne...