Why Low Volatility Bitcoin Could Last A Lot Longer
Much has been said in recent weeks regarding how uncharacteristically calm Bitcoin has been. On weekly timeframes, volatility measures are at their lowest ever. Unfortunately, despite the record-setting lull, directionle...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
Much has been said in recent weeks regarding how uncharacteristically calm Bitcoin has been. On weekly timeframes, volatility measures are at their lowest ever.
Unfortunately, despite the record-setting lull, directionless sideways price action could continue for a lot longer.
Record-Breaking Low Volatility State Could Continue LongerBitcoin price is at a standstill compared to its usually explosive self. It’s remained locked in a tight trading range, to the point where even a $300 move to either side might feel like a major breakout.
Few points throughout history on lower timeframes have ever been this quiet. This is according to the weekly Bollinger Bands and Bollinger Band Width readings.
Extreme tightening in the Bollinger Bands suggests what’s a called a Squeeze setup — a situation where following a low volatility phase of narrowing, the bands then expand and release a wave of volatility. It could be a lot longer until that happens, however.
Examining Monthly Bollinger Band WidthWhile the weekly is at record tightness, using the very same tool on the monthly timeframe, shows that that there could be a lot further to go.
The Bollinger Band Width isn’t as low as it has been prior to past bull runs — notably to the lows of early 2016 and late 2020. This could suggest the possibility of months more sideways before a meaningful breakout to new all-time highs or a collapse back to lows.
None of this says much about direction thus far, but %B might hint at a move to the upside. The tool is plotted depending on price’s percentage relation to the upper, middle, and lower Bollinger Bands. As long as %B remains above 0.5 it means price is above the Bollinger Band basis — which is a 20-month simple moving average
Although we don’t know which direction Bitcoin ultimately moves, we do know that one thing is for certain: volatility will return in a major way. It’s just a matter of when, and how long we have to wait.
The #Bitcoin 1W Bollinger Bands have been the "tightest in its history" for several weeks nowhttps://t.co/1Oux6TB537
But there is a lot more going on if you turn on Bollinger Band Width and %B – two ancillary technical tools related to the BB itself
John Bollinger created the… pic.twitter.com/iGVwoBPWrg
— Tony "The Bull" (@tonythebullBTC) August 7, 2023
Why this matters
This bitcoin story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on NewsBTCRelated market context
Bitcoin Price Forecast: $81,500 Leaves Weekly Close Needing a Big Push
Sunday’s (October 18) Bitcoin price forecast puts it near $ 81,600, with technical indicators sending mixed signals. Shorter-term...
ChatGPT AI Predicts Million-Dollar Bitcoin by 2027
ChatGPT AI predicts Bitcoin will hit $1M+, which isn’t a crazy call, since many analysts share the same view. What makes this pred...
BitTorrent Ushers in Next-Gen Web3 Infrastructure with Strategic Rebrand and Inaugural BTT Burn
The first round of BTT repurchased with decentralized service revenue has been completely burned, as BitTorrent leverages its reim...
Binance Pool To Close November 10, Giving Bitcoin Miners Weeks To Move
TL;DR: Binance will discontinue its mining pool and related services at 07:00 UTC on November 10, 2026. Miners must redirect their...
Bitcoin ETFs log $228M in weekly sales as monthly outflows near $618M
Institutional shifts in Bitcoin ETF flows highlight market volatility and strategic reallocations, impacting broader cryptocurrenc...
Judge Refuses to Erase Gemini’s $5M Settlement Despite CFTC Reversal
In a rare courtroom reversal, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) joined cryptocurrency exchange Gemini in asking a fe...