SEC Says Liquid Staking and Receipt Tokens May Not Be Securities Under Certain Structures
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance published a detailed statement on Tuesday clarifying its views on “liquid staking,” a type of crypto protocol staking where users receive newl...
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance published a detailed statement on Tuesday clarifying its views on “liquid staking,” a type of crypto protocol staking where users receive newly minted tokens representing staked assets.
In a statement, the SEC said the guidance seeks to help crypto participants understand whether these arrangements fall under U.S. securities laws.
BREAKING from @SECGov:
Liquid staking activities and tokens are not considered securities pic.twitter.com/POcFywU6X7
According to the Division, under specific conditions, liquid staking activities and the associated receipt tokens do not involve the offer or sale of securities and therefore do not require SEC registration.
Understanding Liquid Staking and Receipt TokensIn a liquid staking setup, crypto holders deposit their assets with a third-party or protocol-based provider and receive “staking receipt tokens” in return.
These tokens serve as proof of ownership for the deposited crypto and any rewards earned through staking. Unlike traditional staking, liquid staking allows users to retain liquidity—the receipt tokens can be used in other crypto applications or redeemed later, subject to protocol conditions such as “unbonding” periods.
These arrangements can be facilitated either programmatically through self-executing code (protocol-based) or via custodians who manage wallets and interact with staking protocols on behalf of users. In either case, users maintain ownership of their deposited assets throughout the staking process.
SEC’s Position: No Securities Involved in Liquid StakingThe SEC’s Division explains that the actions undertaken in these liquid staking arrangements—including the minting, issuing, and redeeming of staking receipt tokens—do not meet the legal definition of a securities offering, as long as the deposited assets themselves are not securities or part of an investment contract.
This determination hinges on the absence of entrepreneurial or managerial efforts by the Liquid Staking Provider. Providers are not seen as actively managing the user’s investment but merely performing administrative or ministerial functions such as staking the assets or selecting node operators.
Therefore, the economic benefits to users arise directly from the staking activity itself, not from the provider’s business efforts—a key distinction under the Howey Test used to identify investment contracts.
Howey Test Analysis and the Role of the ProviderThe SEC applies the Howey Test to evaluate whether an arrangement constitutes an investment contract. The test looks for three elements: an investment of money, in a common enterprise, with an expectation of profits derived from the efforts of others.
In the case of liquid staking, the Division stresses that the provider’s role is limited to technical facilitation rather than strategic decision-making.
Receipt Tokens Are Not SecuritiesThe SEC also addressed the nature of staking receipt tokens themselves. While they are receipts that confirm ownership of deposited crypto, they are not receipts for securities unless the underlying assets qualify as such.
These tokens do not independently generate rewards; instead, their value reflects the performance of the staked assets. As long as the structure avoids reliance on managerial efforts and adheres to the described protocols, the SEC does not consider these tokens to be part of a securities offering.
The agency cautions, however, that any deviation from these parameters—particularly where providers play a larger, more entrepreneurial role—could change the regulatory outcome. This statement, therefore, offers a framework for compliance but not a blanket exemption.
SEC Launches ‘Project Crypto’ InitiativeSEC Chairman Paul Atkins announced the launch of “Project Crypto” on July 31, a comprehensive initiative designed to modernize securities regulations and allow America’s financial markets to move on-chain.
I had a great discussion today about Project Crypto and the SEC’s strategy to bring crypto innovators and builders back to America with @yahoofinance’s @jenniferisms. Watch my full two-part interview.
Part 1: https://t.co/p4c9Z5UWth
Part 2: https://t.co/2a1FH4cxji
The announcement came during a speech at the America First Policy Institute, where Atkins outlined plans to bring crypto asset distributions back to America and establish regulatory frameworks for digital asset trading.
The post SEC Says Liquid Staking and Receipt Tokens May Not Be Securities Under Certain Structures appeared first on Cryptonews.
Original source
Read on CryptonewsRelated market context
Fireblocks Says Institutional ETH Staking Is Moving Toward Standardized Rails
TL;DR Fireblocks says it has launched ETH Staking Link, a standardized interface for institutional Ethereum staking integrations....
SpaceX’s IPO exposes the first crack in tokenized stocks – fragmented ownership and allocation
SpaceX priced its IPO at $135 per share on June 11, raised $75 billion in the largest public offering in history, and opened on Na...
Metaplanet to Launch Bitcoin Yield Products in Japan After $13 Million Siiibo Securities Deal
Metaplanet has agreed to acquire Siiibo Securities, a licensed Japanese Type I securities firm, as part of its Project Nova strate...
The future of vaults: neobanks and invisible DeFi
The following is a guest post and opinion from Vincent Maliepaard, VP of Marketing at Sentora. On January 26, 2026, Kraken launche...
Kraken Enables USDCx Deposits And Withdrawals On Canton Network
TL;DR Kraken has enabled deposits and withdrawals of USDCx on Canton Network. USDCx is backed 1:1 by USDC held in Circle’s xReserv...
BlackRock secures opportunity to retain NYC pension assets amid climate concerns
BlackRock's renewed chance highlights the growing influence of climate policies on investment strategies and the competitive lands...