Banks acting as validators risks centralization — Everstake exec
New US regulatory guidance allowing banks to become validators for blockchain networks is a major step for institutional adoption but worsens centralization risks, Bohdan Opryshko, chief operating officer of staking serv...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
New US regulatory guidance allowing banks to become validators for blockchain networks is a major step for institutional adoption but worsens centralization risks, Bohdan Opryshko, chief operating officer of staking service provider Everstake, told Cointelegraph.
On March 7, the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) eased its stance on how banks can engage with crypto, including permitting banks to participate “in independent node verification networks,” the regulator said.
Opryshko said US banks’ increased involvement in proof-of-stake (PoS) networks, such as Ethereum and Solana, could be a “double-edged sword.”
“If banks become dominant validators, power could become concentrated, reducing the decentralized nature of PoS networks,” Opryshko told Cointelegraph on March 12.
The additional financial inflows into PoS networks could also suppress staking yields, potentially undermining smaller validators, he added.
“If major institutional players, such as banks, enter the staking market and suddenly stake large amounts, […] it could cause a sharp reduction in staking rewards for all other participants,” Opryshko said.
Staking yields as of March 12. Source: Staking Rewards
Related: OCC lays out crypto banking after Trump vows to end Operation Chokepoint 2.0
As of March 12, Ether stakers earn approximately 5.5% APR, and Solana stakers earn close to 8%, according to data from Staking Rewards.
Staking involves securing blockchains by posting crypto as collateral with validators in exchange for rewards.
Debanking debacleThe OCC’s announcement came after US President Donald Trump vowed to end a prolonged regulatory crackdown that restricted crypto firms’ access to banking services.
Crypto industry outrage over so-called “debanking” reached a crescendo when a June 2024 lawsuit spearheaded by Coinbase resulted in the release of letters showing US banking regulators asked certain financial institutions to “pause” crypto banking activities.
In a Jan. 23 executive order, Trump — who has vowed to make America the “world’s crypto capital” — told agencies to prioritize “fair and open access to banking services” for digital asset firms.
As of March 12, Anchorage Digital is the only federally chartered US bank to offer cryptocurrency staking.
Magazine: SEC’s U-turn on crypto leaves key questions unanswered
Why this matters
This cryptocurrency story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on CointelegraphRelated market context
ECB and EU Central Banks Want the Stablecoin Yield Ban to Reach Lending and Staking
The European Central Bank and the EU’s national central banks asked the European Commission to extend MiCA’s ban on paying interes...
European central banks seek to expand stablecoin yield ban to crypto lending, staking
The expanded ban could stifle innovation in the crypto sector, affecting market dynamics and investor confidence across the EU. Th...
Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong addresses USDC rewards and banking regulations
Coinbase's USDC rewards debate highlights tensions between innovation and regulation, impacting US financial competitiveness and m...
L2 growth and $120 billion in staking hide Ethereum’s supply reality
Ethereum's institutional data hub showed about $120 billion in staked ETH and $40.4 billion in daily average total value locked on...
European central banks push to expand stablecoin yield ban to crypto lending and staking
Central bankers argue that indirect yield structures blur the line between electronic payment tokens and commercial bank deposits,...
Stand With Crypto’s 4 million registered advocates couldn’t get the CLARITY Act through the Senate
The Senate fell short of advancing the CLARITY Act on Sept. 15, when a 49-50 cloture vote failed to reach the 60-vote threshold. S...