BlackRock argues SEC has no grounds to treat crypto futures and spot ETFs differently
BlackRock questioned the SEC's preference for the 1940 Act that oversees futures ETFs, and argued that it lacks relevancy to both crypto-spot and crypto-futures ETFs.
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
BlackRock questioned the SEC's preference for the 1940 Act that oversees futures ETFs, and argued that it lacks relevancy to both crypto-spot and crypto-futures ETFs.
Why this matters
This cryptocurrency story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on CointelegraphRelated market context
BlackRock ETFs outperform Vanguard as South Korea’s emerging market status holds firm
The divergence in ETF performance highlights the significant impact of market classification decisions on investment strategies an...
Blackrock’s IBIT Sees $773 Million Weekly Exit as Bitcoin ETFs Lose $527 Million
Bitcoin and ether funds closed the week in the red for an eighth straight week. Altcoin ETFs, however, showed more resilience, wit...
BlackRock’s 2% Bitcoin cap has a hidden impact – advisors may have to sell during rallies
BlackRock's 1% to 2% Bitcoin allocation range reads as a bullish nod to advisor adoption, but it also works as a boundary. Once Bi...
Bitcoin ETFs Try To Stabilize After A Brutal Run Of Outflows
The spot Bitcoin ETF trade is trying to steady itself again, and the timing matters. After several sessions in which the flow narr...
VanEck Solana ETF Filing Pushes Altcoin Fund Race Beyond Bitcoin And Ethereum
Solana is now formally in the U.S. spot ETF conversation after a VanEck-linked proposal reached the SEC through a Cboe BZX rule fi...
Bitcoin ETFs Post First Negative Half With $5.4 Billion in Outflows, DWF Labs Says
Spot bitcoin ETFs recorded $5.4 billion in net outflows in the first half of 2026, marking their first negative half-year since la...