Coinbase and Circle Challenge Basel Committee’s Stablecoin Regulations
Coinbase and Circle, two prominent players in the cryptocurrency industry, are contesting aspects of a proposal from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision that aims to introduce stricter criteria for the regulatory...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
Coinbase and Circle, two prominent players in the cryptocurrency industry, are contesting aspects of a proposal from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision that aims to introduce stricter criteria for the regulatory treatment of stablecoins held by banks.
The committee’s consultation document, released in December, outlines requirements for stablecoins to qualify for preferential regulatory treatment under a “Group 1b category.” These requirements include maintaining low volatility and adequate liquidity. Comments on the proposal were due by March 28.
In response, Coinbase expressed disappointment with the committee’s approach in a letter submitted on March 28, criticizing many of the requirements as not being based on the actual risk these assets pose to banks. Coinbase argued that the proposed criteria seem to reflect broader policy objectives rather than strictly financial risk considerations.
Additionally, Coinbase accused the committee of aiming to significantly limit banks’ ability to hold and utilize stablecoins.
Circle, the issuer of a popular stablecoin, also raised concerns about the committee’s treatment of permissionless blockchains. The committee suggested that permissionless blockchains present unique risks and indicated they would not be allowed in Group 1 for the time being.
Circle argued that banks should be encouraged to leverage technologies like permissionless blockchains to enhance their digital transformation and cybersecurity efforts. They emphasized their successful partnerships with global banking institutions and advocated for a collaborative approach rather than stigmatizing blockchain-based financial services.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, comprised of global standard setters, plays a crucial role in shaping regulatory frameworks for financial institutions worldwide.
Coinbase and Circle are pushing back against proposed stablecoin regulations from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The proposed regulations aim to determine preferential treatment for stablecoins held by banks. Coinbase criticized the criteria as not being based on actual risk assessment, while Circle advocated for the use of permissionless blockchains in banking.
Featured Image: Megapixl
Why this matters
This cryptocurrency story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on CryptoCurrencyNewsRelated market context
JPMorgan Cuts Polymarket Banking Ties Amid Regulatory Concerns and $20B Valuation
Key Takeaways: In October 2025, JPMorgan apparently broke its ties with Polymarket because of regulatory issues. Since then, Polym...
Citi CEO Wants ‘Good’ Crypto Clarity Act To Get Passed
Bitcoin Magazine Citi CEO Wants ‘Good’ Crypto Clarity Act To Get Passed Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser has said that while some improve...
What the CLARITY Act Actually Does for Bitcoin
Bitcoin Magazine What the CLARITY Act Actually Does for Bitcoin In July 2025, House Republicans staged a coordinated three-bill bl...
Ethereum’s post-quantum roadmap puts banks on a 2027 deadline nobody is talking about
Ethereum's post-quantum migration could create a problem for regulated banks years before any quantum computer poses a real threat...
Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser backs crypto legislation, reveals stablecoin ambitions
Citigroup's crypto push signals a shift in traditional banking, potentially reshaping the financial landscape and influencing regu...
Trump to Host Coinbase, Ripple, Kraken at White House Aug. 19
President Donald Trump is expected to host Coinbase, Ripple and other crypto and prediction-market executives at the White House o...