Crypto advisors used SEC certificates that were never issued
Yesterday, the SEC asked a federal court for injunctions against several crypto investment advisory firms who have displayed fake SEC certificates. Naming crypto operators CryptoOrbit, Ftaexchange, Pinnacle, Quantum, RBH...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
Yesterday, the SEC asked a federal court for injunctions against several crypto investment advisory firms who have displayed fake SEC certificates.
Naming crypto operators CryptoOrbit, Ftaexchange, Pinnacle, Quantum, RBH, and others, the SEC filed a total of 38 civil complaints over phony filings.
For example, the crypto-focused Quantum Financial Institute claimed it had registered investment advisor status that didn’t exist.
One of its incredible press releases pitched “a multi-dimensional intelligent investment system” and “courses” where students could learn about “bitcoin giveaways” and “the highest win-rate strategies, helping students understand the deep logic of the market.”
It even rendered a phony SEC certificate to dupe customers.
Today, the SEC charged 38 entities alleging that they feigned legitimacy as U.S. advisers through false filings to lure retail investors.
Read more below https://t.co/OuJYmUvni2
Commissioners are asking a federal court for injunctions to order civil penalties and to ban the defendants’ reporting exemption privileges for future advisory filings.
At the commission’s direction, FINRA has already removed non-compliant forms for these advisors from adviserinfo.sec.gov.
RBH Infinity Exchange Inc, Pinnacle Crypto Exchange Inc, THEVGPRO Ltd, Quantum Financial Institute Ltd, Ftaexchange Ltd, and other problematic crypto businesses are now defendants of US civil lawsuits.
SEC sues unregistered crypto advisorsThird-party, promotional write-ups of some of these crypto businesses falsely claimed that they carried valid SEC registration with numbers that precisely match yesterday’s SEC enforcement action.
Pinnacle, for example, marketed crypto swaps and its good standing with US regulators. THEVGPRO pitched a BTC backed “settlement security fund, enhancing global liquidity and payment efficiency” with registration numbers that the SEC never approved.
The SEC accuses these entities of making materially false statements on Form ADV, as well as failing to file disclosures.
Commissioners allege violations of Sections 204(a) and 207 of the Investment Advisers Act. They have not quantified investor losses in these initial complaints.
SEC staff attempted to contact many crypto advisors making false claims. Several phone numbers were disconnected or belonged to unrelated businesses. Postal mail was returned as undeliverable.
US, UK, and Canada launch ‘Operation Atlantic’ to tackle crypto fraudRead more: Who is Paul Atkins, Donald Trump’s pick for SEC chairman?
Disconnected phones, undeliverable addressesSeveral unregistered investment advisors claimed to operate out of Colorado despite consistent use of Hong Kong IP addresses.
Apexium Securities Ltd, for example, allegedly used Hong Kong connections while listing a Colorado office where it had no presence.
Web3 University, another unregistered crypto operator, allegedly accessed FINRA’s filing system from the People’s Republic of China. It also used a disconnected phone number and listed an undeliverable Colorado Springs office.
CryptoOrbit, another defendant that commissioners sued yesterday, also claimed to possess SEC certificates that commissioners never issued.
An Ftaexchange crypto-focused press release touted digital asset trading and custody services with phony SEC registered investment adviser status as though it was in good standing.
A press release from RBH announced three health and intellectual-property-themed crypto tokens that are now worthless. It implored readers, “invest in the future — act now.” Hopefully they didn’t.
Pinnacle Crypto Exchange said it had completed SEC registration when it had not.
Absolutaris Base Limited was another defendant in yesterday’s SEC action.
The Better Business Bureau logged consumer complaints about this service, including worthless stock signals, a fake trading app, and advertisements about obviously unsustainable monthly returns of 20-60%.
Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.
The post Crypto advisors used SEC certificates that were never issued appeared first on Protos.
Why this matters
SEC is showing up inside the Regulation theme, so this story is worth tracking for follow-through rather than treating it as a one-off headline.
Original source
Read on ProtosRelated market context
BitTorrent Ushers in Next-Gen Web3 Infrastructure with Strategic Rebrand and Inaugural BTT Burn
The first round of BTT repurchased with decentralized service revenue has been completely burned, as BitTorrent leverages its reim...
Bitcoin (BTC) Price Prediction: Glassnode Signals Potential Price Floor Near $80K as Sellers Capitulate
Similar spikes in Bitcoin’s realized losses preceded local price bottoms in August and September, raising the possibility that the...
New York, Wyoming collaborate on crypto regulation amid GENIUS Act rules
State-federal crypto regulation alignment may boost market stability, foster institutional investment, and accelerate crypto adopt...
MARA Selling Bitcoin? Exchange Deposits Put 1,000 BTC Under Watch
Is MARA Selling Bitcoin? Wallets linked to MARA Holdings sent 1,000 BTC, worth about $82.8 million, to Binance and Gate over five...
Novig and Crypto.com’s Exchange Ask Federal Courts to Shield Them From Missouri Enforcement
Novig and Crypto.com’s U.S. derivatives exchange have asked federal judges to stop Missouri from treating their sports event contr...
More Holders, Little Trading: The RWA Liquidity Problem Is Worse Than You Think
Let me ask you something straight. Does real-world asset trading on crypto exchanges feel like a genuine revolution, or does it fe...