DEF Warns ‘Anti‑DeFi’ Amendments To CLARITY Act Could Threaten Users, Developer Protections
A DeFi advocacy group has warned about a list of proposed amendments to the long-awaited crypto market structure bill that threaten the sector’s developers and hinder innovation in the US. CLARITY Act Amendments Could Ha...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
A DeFi advocacy group has warned about a list of proposed amendments to the long-awaited crypto market structure bill that threaten the sector’s developers and hinder innovation in the US.
CLARITY Act Amendments Could Harm The DeFi SectorOn Wednesday, the DeFi Education Fund (DEF) shared a list of 16 “anti-DeFi amendments” to the Senate Banking Committee’s crypto market structure bill, known as the CLARITY Act, ahead of its highly anticipated Thursday markup session.
In an X post, the advocacy group warned that some of the recent amendments submitted for consideration could harm DeFi technology, users, and developers if they are implemented in the final text of the legislation.
These amendments came from Democratic Senators Catherine Cortez Masto, Andy Kim, Chris Van Hollen, Elizabeth Warren, and Jack Reed, who collectively targeted core DeFi protections in the bill.
Some of the most notable “anti-DeFi” proposals include amendments by Senators Cortez Masto and Reed targeting the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA), which exempts non-controlling developers and providers from federal money transfer requirements.
According to DEF’s assessment of the text, Cortez Masto’s amendments “re-write the BRCA to turn it from a shield to a sword against developers,” and “strike protections for non-controlling developers” in Sections 301 and 302.
Meanwhile, Reed’s amendments reportedly include a “direct attack on Van Loon – 5th Circuit federal court decision by subjecting smart contracts to sanctions ‘without regard to whether such contracts operate autonomously, can be modified, or are owned.’” In addition, he proposed eliminating the BRCS from the CLARITY Act.
Other related amendments also target DeFi front ends, tokenization provisions, and expand BSA/AML obligations for developers and digital asset businesses.
DEF Urges Community ActionThe DeFi Advocacy group called for action against the potential changes, urging X users to contact Senators’ offices to oppose them. However, it noted that Thursday’s markup will not consider every amendment. This gives the community a timely opportunity to press Senators to dismiss the proposals that would affect the industry.
Responding to DEF’s post, Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Semenov also slammed the Senators for targeting the DeFi sector, affirming that they “are trying to push last-minute amendments into Clarity Act that would defeat its entire purpose” and urging community members to act.
Moreover, Justin Slaughter, VP of Regulatory Affairs at Paradigm, highlighted DEF’s “anti-DeFi” list, affirming that they are “basically the key amendments to watch,” alongside those affecting stablecoin rewards, the use of digital assets for tax payments, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) crypto guidelines and rules, and DeFi ability to operate.
It’s worth noting that Senators submitted over 100 amendments to the CLARITY Act’s text ahead of the markup vote, with roughly 40 of them coming from anti-crypto Senator Elizabeth Warren.
As journalist Eleanor Terret reported on X, one of these proposals would prevent the Federal Reserve from issuing master accounts to crypto firms, resulting in heavy criticism from the crypto community and White House Crypto Advisor Patrick Witt.
Why this matters
SEC is showing up inside the Regulation theme, so this story is worth tracking for follow-through rather than treating it as a one-off headline.
Original source
Read on NewsBTCRelated market context
Tokenized stocks can carry the same rights without the same trading protections
Tokenized stocks eligible for the SEC’s September exemption must carry equivalent shareholder rights, yet their trading venues can...
1inch hosts Groundwork forum in Washington to tackle DeFi policy and education
The forum's collaboration between DeFi leaders and policymakers could shape future regulations, impacting the industry's growth an...
Australia’s ASIC seeks to extend trading protections to crypto-settled products
ASIC's updated CFD safeguards could reshape digital asset trading, impacting market strategies and regulatory compliance for broke...
Liquid Bitcoin Redemptions Remain Frozen With 85.8% Reserve Coverage
The reserve gap is about 603 BTC. Liquid says peg-outs require full backing and completed security reviews before they can restart...
CFTC proposes a divide between prediction contracts and sportsbook wagers
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced two actions on Oct. 9 seeking to clarify the federal regulatory boundary betwee...
State of TRON Q3 2026 Report Highlights $2.21 Trillion in Stablecoin Settlement Amid Network Activity Growth
Geneva, Switzerland, October 12, 2026 — TRON DAO, the community-governed DAO dedicated to accelerating the decentralization of the...