India’s Supreme Court Questions Centre Over Lack of Clear Crypto Policy
The Supreme Court of India has sought answers from the Centre on why it hasn’t formed “clear-cut” crypto regulations. The court questioned the Centre’s lack of action on framing crypto policies.The matter came into light...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
The Supreme Court of India has sought answers from the Centre on why it hasn’t formed “clear-cut” crypto regulations. The court questioned the Centre’s lack of action on framing crypto policies.
The matter came into light on Monday while hearing a case from a petitioner who faced allegations of cryptocurrency fraud.
A bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh said that unregulated Bitcoin trading was “nothing but a more polished form of Hawala.” Per a local report, they suggested that regulation could provide supervision on the sector and curb its use in illicit operations.
“Why does Centre not come out with a clear-cut policy on regulating cryptocurrency?” the court asked on Monday. “There is a parallel under-market for it and it can affect the economy. By regulating the cryptocurrency, you can keep an eye on the trade.”
Banning Crypto Will Not Be Wise: Supreme CourtFurther, the court emphasized that almost “two years ago” it had sought clarification on India’s stance towards digital assets.
The Justice bench has also said that banning these wouldn’t be a wise decision, but regulating them would be.
“Nobody is saying to stop it, because wouldn’t not be wise for the economy,” the court observed. “Banning may be shutting your eyes from ground reality. But what about regulating it?”
(Shailesh Babulal Bhatt v. State of Gujarat & Another)
Justice Kant: In one of the matter, almost two years back, I made an observation and called upon learned Attorney General that are you doing something to regulate this crypto currency?
He came and said that we can't.… pic.twitter.com/OTcDVdlPbf
Additionally, the court advocated the matter to be taken up in consultation with experts. “We aren’t experts. Experts would examine it, but some steps to regulate it and have an eye on it.”
Besides, Bitcoin trading profits taxed at 30% implies a form of “legal recognition,” the court added. “If it is already acknowledged in this manner, why not regulate it.”
Disconnect Between Bitcoin Trading Boom and Govt’s Sluggish Regulatory ResponseThis is not the first time India’s highest court has addressed the government’s unresponsive nature on regulating cryptocurrencies.
Early this month, law authorities highlighted the growing disconnect between rising Bitcoin trading and lack of proper regulations. The same two-judge bench reiterated that the legality of Bitcoin trading remains murky in India.
In February 2022, the court had asked the government to clarify whether cryptocurrency trading was legal in India and to outline a roadmap for enforcement.
However, in January 2024, the Centre responded to the court’s questions saying that a decision on regulating cryptocurrencies was still pending.
The post India’s Supreme Court Questions Centre Over Lack of Clear Crypto Policy appeared first on Cryptonews.
Why this matters
This cryptocurrency story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on CryptonewsRelated market context
Standard Chartered Launched UAE Crypto Trading
Standard Chartered launched a crypto trading service in the UAE on 14 October, allowing eligible Professional Investor clients to...
Standard Chartered Debuts Bitcoin Trading For Wealthy UAE Clients
Bitcoin Magazine Standard Chartered Debuts Bitcoin Trading For Wealthy UAE Clients British multinational Standard Chartered on Wed...
Ethereum NFT Marketplace Blur to Shutter After Trading Volume Vanishes
Once the largest Ethereum NFT marketplace around, Blur said this week that it will shut off its frontend in November, concluding i...
A $5 billion Bitcoin fortune is at stake, but UK court says being defrauded isn’t enough to claim it
A London judge rejected Chinese fraud victims' bid to use English law to claim more than 61,000 seized Bitcoin. In an Oct. 12 ruli...
BlackRock’s Larry Fink warns data center moratorium could trigger recession
A data center moratorium could hinder AI infrastructure growth, risking economic slowdown and diminishing US competitiveness again...
StarkWare launches OffMarket for private trading on Polymarket
OffMarket's launch could revolutionize DeFi by enhancing privacy, potentially attracting more users to prediction markets without...