Sam Bankman-Fried’s lawyers appeal decision on bail, citing First Amendment issues
Lawyers questioned a judge’s decision to revoke bail on Aug. 11, claiming SBF speaking to a journalist about Caroline Ellison was “protected First Amendment activity.”
Lawyers questioned a judge’s decision to revoke bail on Aug. 11, claiming SBF speaking to a journalist about Caroline Ellison was “protected First Amendment activity.”
Original source
Read on CointelegraphRelated market context
Sam Bankman-Fried loses appeal against crypto fraud conviction
The ruling underscores the judiciary's commitment to equating crypto fraud with traditional financial crimes, setting a stern prec...
SEC employees caught playing golf while claiming to work from home
This incident may undermine trust in remote work policies and impact future SEC funding requests, affecting its regulatory capabil...
BlackRock Files Likely-Final Amendment for Yield-Generating Bitcoin ETF With 65bps Fee, Launch Expected Soon
BlackRock filed what Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas described as a likely-final amendment for its iShares Bitcoin Premium In...
KB Kookmin Bank issues $100M blockchain-based bond in Hong Kong
This issuance could accelerate blockchain adoption in traditional finance, potentially transforming debt markets and settlement pr...
BlackRock files final amendment for Bitcoin Premium Income ETF as race with Goldman Sachs heats up
The launch of BlackRock's ETF could intensify competition in crypto income products, influencing fee structures and investor strat...
Pending Bank of Japan rate decision may impact Bitcoin price: Should traders prepare?
Bitcoin’s average price response to Bank of Japan rate hikes was a 22.5% sell-off. Will BOJ’s upcoming policy decision trigger ano...