SEC Reiterates Binance’s Illegal Operations, Highlights “Lack of Disclosure”
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has expanded its lawsuit against Binance. The updated legal filings now include a wider range of tokens, with Axie Infinity among those listed as securities.In t...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has expanded its lawsuit against Binance. The updated legal filings now include a wider range of tokens, with Axie Infinity among those listed as securities.
In the latest update to the SEC v. Binance lawsuit, the regulator has accused Binance and its US affiliate, BAM Trading, of enabling the trade of tokens now deemed unregistered securities. The SEC alleges that Binance actively promotes these newly classified securities tokens to customers, emphasizing their potential returns.
SEC Expands Binance Lawsuit
The SEC stated: “Binance and BAM Trading fill these markets with information republishing and amplifying the issuer and promoter statements and activity promoting [tokens] as an investment.”
The amendment to the complaint also reiterates the SEC’s stance that Binance operated illegally as an unregistered exchange, broker-dealer, and clearing agency. The regulator claims that Binance used interstate commerce to conduct transactions in securities for others.
SEC TARGETS MORE TOKENS IN BINANCE LAWSUITThe SEC has intensified its lawsuit against Binance, adding tokens like Axie Infinity (AXS), Filecoin (FIL), and Cosmos (ATOM) to its list of unregistered securities. The updated filing alleges that Binance and BAM Trading facilitated… pic.twitter.com/S6VUwKxQkH
— IBC Group Official (@ibcgroupio) September 13, 2024SEC Criticized over Terminology
The SEC’s filing further asserts that Binance failed to provide proper disclosure regarding the risks and legality of the tokens traded on its international and US platforms.
Amid its ongoing legal battle with Kraken, the SEC has faced criticism after admitting that the term “crypto asset security” is not formally defined.
Stuart Alderoty, Chief Legal Officer at Ripple, criticized the SEC for what he called a “twisted pretzel of contradictions,” referring to Footnote 6 of the amended complaint against Binance. Alderoty claimed the regulator “regrets any confusion it may have invited.”
This article was written by Tareq Sikder at www.financemagnates.com.Why this matters
This cryptocurrency story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on Finance MagnatesRelated market context
SEC clears regulatory hurdle as crypto token buybacks hit record $638 million
Crypto projects spent about $638 million with token buybacks through late August 2026, according to Allium Labs data. That is alre...
Why your tokenized stock could stop trading for three months
Buying a tokenized stock sounds as though it should be simple. You pick a company you know, buy a token representing its shares, a...
SEC staff’s staking-token split spotlights the exit risks behind staked ETH tokens
An ETH holder can sell a liquid-staking token while the ETH behind it remains staked. A Sept. 25 SEC staff FAQ draws a conditional...
SEC Clarifies When Crypto Buybacks And Network Upgrades Can Raise Securities Questions
TL;DR SEC staff has published new FAQs explaining how federal securities laws may apply to crypto-asset buybacks, network upgrades...
New York Sues Polymarket Over Alleged Illegal Gambling Operation
New York Attorney General Letitia James and Governor Kathy Hochul have announced a lawsuit against Polymarket US. The state allege...
SEC staff says certain crypto buybacks and staking tokens fall outside securities laws
SEC staff issued new crypto guidance covering token buybacks, staking receipt tokens, marketing and when ongoing network developme...