Silvergate downfall sparks debate over whose fault it actually was
The demise of the crypto-friendly bank has prompted discussion about who tipped the first domino, and where crypto firms can turn for their banking needs.
The demise of the crypto-friendly bank has prompted discussion about who tipped the first domino, and where crypto firms can turn for their banking needs.
Original source
Read on CointelegraphRelated market context
Banks are buying Bitcoin vaults, but a quantum problem may be waiting inside
The banks are finally buying the vaults. In May, BNY, the world's largest custodian with $59.4 trillion in assets under custody an...
Elon Musk’s SpaceX IPO fever sparks $1 billion crypto bet before Nasdaq debut
Crypto traders have turned Elon Musk’s expected SpaceX listing into a round-the-clock proxy market, pushing more than $1 billion t...
Japan’s SBI is using XRP to solve a banking problem
SBI Shinsei Bank is reportedly offering crypto deposit rewards to customers, with vouchers worth 20% of their interest payments re...
Carlos Domingo: The DTCC is repeating telecom’s mistakes, banks need the Clarity Act more than crypto, and stablecoins set the benchmark for tokenized assets | The Wolf Of All Streets
Financial institutions must choose between proprietary systems or embracing open blockchain technologies for future growth. The po...
Japan Three Biggest Banks Unite to Launch Yen Crypto Stablecoin by March 2027
MUFG Bank, Mizuho Bank, and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation have established a formal joint council to develop and co-issue a...
Cape Verde’s World Cup fairy tale sparks crypto speculation, but investors should tread carefully
Cape Verde's World Cup debut highlights the speculative risks in crypto markets, urging investors to discern between official and...