Top Banking Body Approves Disclosure Framework for Crypto Exposure
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has confirmed the approval of a final disclosure framework, which includes a standardised set of tables and templates for banks to report their crypto asset exposure, the organi...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has confirmed the approval of a final disclosure framework, which includes a standardised set of tables and templates for banks to report their crypto asset exposure, the organisation announced yesterday (Wednesday).
A Proper Disclosure Framework
The decision was finalised as the organisation met virtually on 2 and 3 July to discuss various policy and supervisory incentives. The framework will be published later this month and will be effective from 1 January 2026.
At its July meeting, the #BaselCommittee approved a disclosure framework for banks’ cryptoasset exposures and agreed to make targeted amendments to its cryptoasset standard #BaselIII https://t.co/D62XJBuuc7 pic.twitter.com/VHYvHepvXA
— Bank for International Settlements (@BIS_org) July 3, 2024The disclosure framework was originally proposed in December 2022 and opened for comments in May 2023. It includes a set of target amendments to the original proposal and revisions to the prudential standard for stablecoin holdings.
“These revisions aim to further promote a consistent understanding of the standard, particularly regarding the criteria for stablecoins to receive a preferential 'Group 1b' regulatory treatment. The updated standard will be published later this month, with an implementation date of 1 January 2026,” the official announcement stated.
The committee has been evaluating banks' exposure to cryptocurrency since 2019. In 2021, it suggested categorising crypto in its high-risk Group 2 assets, assigning it a 1,250% risk weight. This would necessitate banks to hold capital equivalent to the value of their crypto exposure. Additionally, Group 2 holdings would be limited to less than 1% of the value of their Group 1 holdings.
Stablecoins were assigned a new 1b designation, exempting them from additional requirements beyond those for Group 1 assets. However, stablecoins with "ineffective stabilisation mechanisms" were placed in Group 2. The proposed restrictions received a lukewarm response from the industry.
Evaluating the Risks
The organisation's members further discussed the prudential implications of banks as potential issuers of tokenised deposits and stablecoins. The scale and stability of such products depend in part on their specific structure and judicial laws and regulations.
“Based on current market developments, these risks are broadly captured by the Basel Framework,” the announcement added. “The Committee will continue to monitor this area and other developments in the cryptoasset markets.”
Meanwhile, the European Union recently imposed Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) on stablecoin issuers. So, stablecoin issuers need to follow MiCA, along with the Basel Committee, when they are effective.
This article was written by Arnab Shome at www.financemagnates.com.Why this matters
This cryptocurrency story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on Finance MagnatesRelated market context
Trump to meet Coinbase, Ripple and crypto leaders as CLARITY Act odds collapse to 10%
President Donald Trump and the heads of the SEC and CFTC are expected to meet crypto and prediction-market executives at the White...
Crypto crash liquidations face massive data gap as public records contradict $18B Solana claim
Solana Research Institute, a Solana-aligned research group, used an Aug. 14 post to revive a July open letter by Angus Scott to th...
SEC cancels crypto fundraising meeting, leaving token issuers with no new path to fund development
The US Securities and Exchange Commission canceled the open meeting scheduled for Friday morning, delaying the first public look a...
What the CLARITY Act Actually Does for Bitcoin
Bitcoin Magazine What the CLARITY Act Actually Does for Bitcoin In July 2025, House Republicans staged a coordinated three-bill bl...
Ethereum’s post-quantum roadmap puts banks on a 2027 deadline nobody is talking about
Ethereum's post-quantum migration could create a problem for regulated banks years before any quantum computer poses a real threat...
From MiCA to GENIUS: Why Crypto's Next Regulatory Test Is Cross-Border Coordination
The central debate in digital asset policy used to be whether to regulate at all. That question is now settled. MiCA's transitiona...