US Government Sued Following Seizing $100,000,000 in Cash, Gold and Jewelry From Citizens
It has been just reported that the US government has been sued. The reason? They allegedly seized $100 million in cash from people without any viable explanation. Check out the latest reports about this below. US governm...
It has been just reported that the US government has been sued. The reason? They allegedly seized $100 million in cash from people without any viable explanation. Check out the latest reports about this below.
US government suedA new lawsuit reveals that the US government has seized over $100 million from safety deposit boxes in California, but has not provided any specific reasons for doing so.
The Institute for Justice, a nonprofit organization, is now working to stop the forfeiture proceedings for the affected citizens, who have had their assets taken away by the FBI without proper explanation.
According to the latest reports coming from the online pubcalition the Daily Hodl, the case is centered on a Los Angeles-based couple who says the FBI won’t say why it abruptly seized $40,200 of their life savings from a safety deposit box.
“Linda and Reggie Martin want to know why the FBI took their cash, along with the contents of hundreds of other people’s safety deposit boxes, from a financial storage company in Beverly Hills in March of 2021,” the online pubcalition notes.
The couple says the agency seized their money without providing any evidence of illegal activity.
Attorney Bob Belden stated as per the same online pubcalition the fact that the FBI’s move is plainly immoral and violates the Martins’ rights as American citizens.
“The government shouldn’t get to take your property if it can’t tell you what you did wrong.”
He continued and stated the following:
“Using civil forfeiture, the government decides for itself whether to take and try to keep the property, even when it doesn’t suspect the owners of any crime. Then, the FBI sends copy-and-paste forfeiture notices that fail to tell owners anything about why it is trying to take their property. That’s not only wrong; it’s unconstitutional.”
Check out the original article in order to learn more details about this.
Original source
Read on CryptoGazetteRelated market context
Tether USDT Briefly Overtakes Ethereum in Market Cap: A $187B Wake-Up Call
For a few hours, earlier this week, Tether USDT stablecoin held a higher market cap than Ethereum, the first time that has happene...
Kraken Enables USDCx Deposits And Withdrawals On Canton Network
TL;DR Kraken has enabled deposits and withdrawals of USDCx on Canton Network. USDCx is backed 1:1 by USDC held in Circle’s xReserv...
SpaceX IPO Shatters Records as Bitcoin Sinks Below $60,000 and Tether Overtakes Ether
SpaceX raises $75bn in historic IPO; Bitcoin falls below $60,000 with half of supply in loss; Tether briefly overtakes Ether in a...
Bitcoin Selloff Leaves Half of Supply Underwater as Tether Briefly Overtakes Ether
Bitcoin's drop below $60,000 leaves half of supply in loss, while Tether briefly overtakes Ether in a reality check for crypto mar...
Carlo Ancelotti takes responsibility for Brazil’s 1-1 draw with Morocco as crypto fan tokens enter the World Cup spotlight
Ancelotti's debut highlights challenges of foreign leadership in Brazil, while FIFA's blockchain ventures could reshape fan engage...
North Korea declares denuclearization irreversibly terminated, raising stakes for crypto security
North Korea's stance heightens geopolitical tensions and underscores the urgent need for enhanced cybersecurity measures in the cr...