Why isn’t the Federal Reserve requiring banks to hold depositors’ cash?
The fact that most banks aren’t required to keep your money on hand makes it likely that more bank failures will occur in the months ahead.
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
The fact that most banks aren’t required to keep your money on hand makes it likely that more bank failures will occur in the months ahead.
Why this matters
This cryptocurrency story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on CointelegraphRelated market context
Stablecoin Growth Cooled as Deposit Rates Rose, With USDC Most Exposed, Working Paper Says
When U.S. banks paid savers more, stablecoins grew more slowly, according to a Bank for International Settlements working paper pu...
Banks Hold a Lever Over Stablecoin Adoption, BIS Economists Say
A Bank for International Settlements working paper found that stablecoin growth slows when U.S. banks raise deposit rates, with Ci...
Strive Lifts Bitcoin Holdings to 36,818 BTC Ahead of $700 Million SATS Settlement
Strive (Nasdaq: ASST) now holds 36,818 bitcoin after buying 1,223 BTC between Oct. 14 and Oct. 16, the company disclosed in a Form...
Hackers Still Hold $287 Million in Stolen Crypto That Can’t Be Frozen, Blockaid Report Says
Hackers who stole crypto this year still control $287.1 million in wallets that investigators can watch but have no means to freez...
JPMorgan Takes JPM Coin To Ethereum As Banks Test Public-Chain Settlement
JPMorgan is taking its bank-issued deposit token onto public Ethereum, an expansion that puts an established Wall Street payments...
Novig and Crypto.com’s Exchange Ask Federal Courts to Shield Them From Missouri Enforcement
Novig and Crypto.com’s U.S. derivatives exchange have asked federal judges to stop Missouri from treating their sports event contr...