Bitcoin Vs. Ethereum As Settlement Networks
Comparing the volume and efficiency of settlement on the base layers of the Bitcoin and Ethereum networks.The below is from the latest monthly report by the Deep Dive, Bitcoin Magazine's premium markets newsletter. To be...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
Comparing the volume and efficiency of settlement on the base layers of the Bitcoin and Ethereum networks.
The below is from the latest monthly report by the Deep Dive, Bitcoin Magazine's premium markets newsletter. To be among the first to receive these insights and other on-chain bitcoin market analysis straight to your inbox, subscribe now.
“We need to move NFTs onto the Layer 2 ecosystem to cut fees. However, doing that *right* requires good cross-rollup portability standards, so the ecosystem can avoid getting locked into one particular L2.” - Vitalik Buterin, Creator of Ethereum
Many people are familiar with the recent none-fungible token (NFT) craze that has occurred over recent months, with digital images of rocks and pixelated characters selling for millions of dollars. Bubble, fad, or the start of something much bigger? That, we cannot know, and we aren’t going to discuss the validity of NFTs as an investment (read: speculation) in today’s Daily Dive, but rather we are going to dive into the comparison of Bitcoin versus Ethereum as monetary settlement networks, as Ethereum proponents have attempted to frame ETH as “ultrasound money” increasingly over the course of 2021.
Today, we will examine various metrics comparing the volume and efficiency of settlement on the base layer of the Bitcoin and Ethereum networks.
The first thing that is key to distinguish is the difference between transfer volume and change-adjusted transfer volume.
For an in-depth description of how change outputs work, click here.
When looking at total transfer volume across the base layer of the Bitcoin and Ethereum networks, the seven-day average for transfer volumes are as follows:
BTC: $168.5 billion
BTC (change adjusted): $41.8 billion
ETH: $8.7 billion
Below are the charts in both linear and logarithmic scale:
BTC Versus ETH Total Transfer Volume (Log)BTC Versus ETH Total Transfer Volume (Linear)
Here is the comparison of the average daily fees on the base layer of both blockchains over the last week:
BTC: $0.8 million
ETH: $54.3 million
BTC Versus ETH Daily Fees ($) (Linear)BTC Versus ETH Daily Fees ($) (Log)
When comparing the efficiency of settlement (total daily value transfer divided by daily fees) of the two blockchains, the comparison couldn't be more clear.
Bitcoin is purpose built for one thing: value storage and settlement. It is the world's first and only perfected monetary settlement network, and it is actively scaling to serve the entire globe.
Below is the comparison of settlement efficiency (total daily value transfer divided by daily fees) between the two blockchains:
BTC: 206,989
BTC (change adjusted): 51,428
ETH: 160
Why this matters
This ethereum story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on Bitcoin MagazineRelated market context
Google Gemini AI Predicts Bitcoin Price by the End of 2026
An accounting rule change might be the most underrated catalyst on this list. Google Gemini AI predicts it will help carry Bitcoin...
Zcash is borrowing crypto’s new institutional playbook as privacy goes mainstream
Zcash Labs launched Aug. 6 to move Zcash deeper into business and institutional use. The independent group is focused on integrati...
Ethereum’s post-quantum roadmap puts banks on a 2027 deadline nobody is talking about
Ethereum's post-quantum migration could create a problem for regulated banks years before any quantum computer poses a real threat...
Fidelity Seeks SEC Approval to Add Staking to Ethereum ETF
Key Takeaways: Fidelity has applied to the SEC to enable it to stake an unlimited percentage of its eligible Ether under normal co...
Gaming firm GameSquare boasts a $26M Ethereum fortune, but quiet debt fine print leaves just $2.1M in real cash
GameSquare Holdings reported stronger second-quarter operations alongside a $7.83 million crypto-linked accounting loss. The gamin...
Metaplanet burned through 83% of a $500 million credit line to build 43,000 BTC, and now it wants investors to fund the next leg
Metaplanet moved over 5,000 Bitcoin (worth about $322 million) this week, triggering market speculation that the firm might be liq...