Crypto users have been complaining about a recent Consensys privacy policy update that says when Infura is leveraged as a remote procedure call (RPC) via Metamask, wallet and IP address data is collected. The news follows a similar decision the decentralized exchange (dex) platform Uniswap recently made concerning data collection. The dex platformâs operator, Uniswap Labs, revealed that the companyâs software collects its usersâ onchain data to bolster âdata-driven decisions that improve user experience.â
Consensys Privacy Policy Reveals User Data CollectionThe digital currency community and the social media demographic known as âcrypto Twitterâ (CT), has been talking an awful lot about Consensysâ privacy policy. The privacy policy applies to the firmâs Ethereum infrastructure platform Infura and the Web3 wallet Metamask.
According to the policy, if a user leverages Infura and an RPC using Metamask, the software will collect the userâs crypto address and IP information. Infura, however, is Metamaskâs default RPC provider and another RPC can be utilized. For instance, if a user operates its own node. Users can also switch to another RPC like Tatum, Moralis, Alchemy, and Quicknode.
"ConsenSys is committed to maintaining the highest standards when it comes to your privacy"
Also, we collect basically every available piece of data from you other than a DNA sample.
If you aren't using a custom RPC for Metamask, I'd suggest doing so now. pic.twitter.com/WizpplYRFE
â âđ¶đđ„đŻ.Îđ±đ„ (@CyphrETH) November 24, 2022
If the user switches the RPC calls on Metamask from Infura to something else, the userâs crypto address and IP information wonât be collected. The Consensys move follows Uniswap Labs explaining a similar decision in a blog post called âUniswap Labsâ Commitment to Privacy.â
Uniswapâs decision was criticized a great deal and Consensysâ privacy policy started making the rounds on Nov. 24. The Metamask and Infura subject has been getting just as much flak on social media and crypto-related forums. Bitcoin supporter and editor at satoshipapers.org, Tuur Demeester, shared his two cents about the situation.
âEtherean wakes up to the value of running his own full node, only to realize thatâs no longer an option,â Demeester tweeted. âTo wit: First centralized stakers began censoring transactions. Now Metamask, the main [Ethereum] access provider, is recording IP and wallet addresses.â
Ethereum supporter Adam Cochran said it was a âdumb move.â âAlright this Metamask privacy lapse is yet another dumb move from Consensys,â Cochran tweeted. âShill me your best easy self-hosted nodes either hardware or SaaS service,â he added.
Metamask tweeted about the situation on Nov. 24 explaining that the privacy policy was updated the day prior. âThe language in our privacy policy was updated on November 23rd,â the Metamask walletâs official Twitter account said. âNothing has changed in the way MetaMask and Infura operate. Hereâs a statement clarifying what we do with user data (spoiler: nothing).â
The statement Metamask shared was a blog post published by Consensys which says âthe updates to the policy do not result in more intrusive data collection or data processing, and were not made in response to any regulatory changes or inquiries.â
What do you think about Consensysâ privacy policy update? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.