BlackRock And Big Players Could Take Over Bitcoin Mining
It has been just revealed that a terrible warning is floating above the crypto space. Bitcoin mining could be taken over by BlackRock and the big players. Check out the latest reports about this really worrisome claim. B...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
It has been just revealed that a terrible warning is floating above the crypto space. Bitcoin mining could be taken over by BlackRock and the big players. Check out the latest reports about this really worrisome claim.
BlackRock and big players could take over BTC miningAccording to Bloomberg’s crypto market analyst, Jamie Coutts, Bitcoin (BTC) might be vulnerable to being taken over by the powerhouses of the traditional financial system.
Coutts shared data on social media platform X, revealing that BlackRock, the world’s biggest asset manager, began gaining proxy exposure to Bitcoin in 2020 by purchasing shares of mining company Marathon Digital.
He suggests that BlackRock’s move may have been a precursor to its recent application for a Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF).
Coutts notes that BlackRock and other large investors like Vanguard and StateStreet, who prioritize environmental, social and governance (ESG)-driven investing principles, started purchasing public mining stock in 2020.
BlackRock began investing in Marathon Digital three years ago when hostility towards mining was high, possibly due to the industry’s heavy reliance on fossil fuels at the time.
According to an analyst, the world’s largest asset managers have become the leading investors in the three biggest publicly traded Bitcoin miners, holding about 8.9% of all hash power.
This institutionalization of Bitcoin may present new challenges, as the larger players may not share the same goals and interests as the smaller entities.
While a “51% attack,” where one or multiple actors control most of the hash rate, is unlikely, there may be a risk of creeping influence that goes against the values of the network. However, this should not be interpreted as FUD as the online publication the Daily Hodl notes.
“This conflict could involve misaligned ESG objectives or potential censorship of transactions. Neither would prevent the chain from operating; other miners could process censored transactions (while collecting the fees).
But, given the activist tendencies of these big asset managers, it remains unclear if their intentions toward Bitcoin miners will be passive in nature.”
Why this matters
This mining story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on CryptoGazetteRelated market context
Harvard maintains BlackRock bitcoin ETF stake at $101M in Q2
Harvard's endowment held ~3 million IBIT shares worth $101M in Q2 2026, keeping it among the largest university holders of a spot...
A staked Ethereum ETF processed $48M in redemptions while keeping 86% of ETH locked, 21Shares filing shows
The 21Shares Ethereum ETF, which trades as TETH, reported $48.4 million in TETH redemptions during the first half of 2026 and ende...
Paul Tudor Jones’ Blackrock Bitcoin ETF Bet Hits $22.9M
Billionaire hedge fund manager Paul Tudor Jones’ Tudor Investment Corp increased its stake in Blackrock’s spot Bitcoin exchange-tr...
Paul Tudor Jones’ investment firm increases stake in BlackRock's bitcoin ETF after year of selling
Calls fell 85.2% to 148,000 underlying shares, while puts slipped 1.4% to 715,000.
Abu Dhabi Sovereign Wealth Funds Keep Big Bitcoin Positions
Bitcoin Magazine Abu Dhabi Sovereign Wealth Funds Keep Big Bitcoin Positions Bitcoin is the most important asset in two of Abu Dha...
Edelman Financial’s $34M Bitcoin ETF Bet Tops Its Amazon Stake
Edelman Financial Engines, which manages $326 billion in client assets, disclosed a $34 million position in spot bitcoin exchange-...