Ethereum Miner Returns ‘Erroneously High’ $22 Million Gas Fee to Bitfinex’s Wallet
Yesterday, a transaction stemming from a crypto wallet attached to the exchange Bitfinex mistakenly paid a fee of around $22.3 million, or 7,626 Ethereum, for a $100,000 transaction. Shortly after, the mining pool has re...
Yesterday, a transaction stemming from a crypto wallet attached to the exchange Bitfinex mistakenly paid a fee of around $22.3 million, or 7,626 Ethereum, for a $100,000 transaction.
Shortly after, the mining pool has returned the erroneous fee back to Bitfinex’s wallet via three transactions of 1 ETH, 7,385 ETH, and 240 ETH, respectively.
While the mining pool that received the enormous gas fee is anonymous, it is currently ranked 9th among the largest Ethereum miners and is responsible for roughly 3.1% of the network’s hash rate, according to Etherscan.
“Thank you to the miner of block 13307440 who we can confirm is returning 7,626 ETH that were incorrectly paid today as a tx fee,” decentralized crypto exchange (DEX) DeversiFi tweeted.
The blockchain is immutable.
But the revolution we are part of is defined by our values as humans.⁰⁰
Thank you to the miner of block 13307440 who we can confirm is returning 7626 ETH that were incorrectly paid today as a tx fee.
A post mortem will follow tomorrow. https://t.co/FqkEZ9DK8P
— DeversiFi (@deversifi) September 27, 2021
DeversiFi was previously known as Ethfinex, a sister exchange of crypto trading platform Bitfinex. In 2019, the two firms parted company via a “management buyout” and Ethfinex was rebranded into DeversiFi. Notably, the three co-founders of the DEX also worked at Bitfinex in the past, as per Bloomberg.
The connection doesn’t stop there, however.
Due to yesterday’s events, it has now become clear that the DEX also has access to at least one of Bitfinex’s crypto wallets to help subside transaction costs for users.
Ethereum-based exchange DeversiFi gets an upgrade, targets pro traders Transaction error: Bitfinex or DeversiFi?“At 11:10 UTC on the 27th September a deposit transaction was made using a hardware wallet from the main DeversiFi user interface with an erroneously high gas fee,” the DEX later acknowledged on Twitter.
At 11:10 UTC on the 27th September a deposit transaction was made using a hardware wallet from the main DeversiFi user interface with an erroneously high gas fee.https://t.co/OpSHkkFiBo
— DeversiFi (@deversifi) September 27, 2021
A spokesperson for Bitfinex also confirmed to Decrypt that the transaction in question “belongs to DeversiFi.”
“This transaction was a transaction to deposit funds on the DeversiFi L2 solution. These transactions are extremely rare and third-party companies cover the costs of such integrations. DeversiFi confirmed that they will take care of it,” a Bitfinex representative told Decrypt.
Original source
Read on DecryptRelated market context
Blockworks Acquires Messari in Deal Highlighting Crypto’s Data Consolidation Race
Bitcoin Magazine Blockworks Acquires Messari in Deal Highlighting Crypto’s Data Consolidation Race Blockworks, the New York-based...
Crypto exchanges are opening a two-front war for the stock market
Binance, Kraken, Bybit, and Gemini are moving to add US stocks and ETFs to their crypto trading apps, making a direct play for the...
Ethereum Price Prediction: 3 Million ETH Rushes Into Staking as Sellers Vanish
Is nobody leaving Ethereum? A record 36 million ETH is now locked in staking, roughly 29–30% of the circulating supply, and the va...
XRP aims for $0.90 as ETF demand battles selling pressure from whales
XRP is trading at $1.11, down roughly 17% from its June opening, having set a new 2026 low on June 5 and shed $8 billion in market...
THE THIRD RUSH: Where is the “Bitcoin” of the Ai Goldrush?
After months of deep thinking & a lot of discussions with some very smart people, I’ve decided to write an article for the first t...
Tether blacklists wallet linked to $120M USDT transfer, freezes $72M
Tether's frequent fund freezes highlight the centralized control over USDT, raising concerns about asset accessibility and regulat...