Forget About The Strategic Bitcoin Reserve For A Moment — Mining Censorship Is Back
Follow Aaron on Nostr or X. The news got buried in part due to Trump’s inauguration and subsequent rumblings of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve (SBR), but developer b10c recently published research showing that F2Pool — a mi...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
The news got buried in part due to Trump’s inauguration and subsequent rumblings of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve (SBR), but developer b10c recently published research showing that F2Pool — a mining pool representing ~11% of hash power on the Bitcoin network — is censoring OFAC-sanctioned transactions… again.
In case you don’t know what this means: the US Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) maintains a list of sanctioned entities, including a number of Bitcoin addresses; it’s illegal to do business with these entities under US law. It’s actually unclear if this means miners cannot include transactions to and from these addresses in blocks they produce — but F2Pool appears to be rather safe than sorry.
Now, as long as it’s just F2Pool applying this policy, this is not really an issue. Some transactions will be delayed by about ten minutes or so, once in a while, but that’s about it.
If more pools start doing it, the delays will get longer and more frequent — but still not terrible. Not even if it’s a majority of pools.
The real issue will arise if a majority of mining pools not only censors transactions, but also refuses to build on top of blocks that do include these transactions. If this were to happen, these transactions wouldn’t confirm at all anymore… not for as long as these mining pools remain a majority. Bitcoin would no longer be censorship-resistant.
I can’t really fault F2Pool for adopting their policy. Although I would much prefer it if no mining pools censor, we unfortunately live in a world where even open source software developers may face prison time for enabling users to transact freely.
Rather than flirting with an SBR, it would be great if the new Trump administration first just stopped such state attacks on Bitcoin.
This article is a Take. Opinions expressed are entirely the author's and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.
Why this matters
This mining story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on Bitcoin MagazineRelated market context
Trump-related American Bitcoin has lost more than 90% of its value
Hut 8-owned BTC mining firm, American Bitcoin, has dramatically underperformed BTC since its reverse merger which allowed it to be...
Abracadabra blames hacks for shutdown amid ‘looting’ claims
Embattled DeFi project Abracadabra has proposed “an orderly wind down,” blaming a string of security incidents which leave its sta...
Pakistan explores Bitcoin mining with surplus energy, but landfill methane link remains unconfirmed
Pakistan's dual energy initiatives highlight a strategic pivot towards monetizing surplus resources, potentially reshaping its eco...
Aave’s $50 million lending plan could lose money without a single default
Aave’s proposed institutional lending business would put crypto collateral on both sides of the financing chain. Institutions woul...
UK’s 2027 crypto rules let firms remove trust protection from Bitcoin lent for yield
UK crypto firms can now apply for authorization as of Sept. 30, bringing Bitcoin holders closer to a rulebook that will treat coin...
Bitcoin Price Tests $83,000 Ahead of Key PCE Inflation Release
Bitcoin price is trading at $83,000 ahead of the August core PCE release, just 0.71% above its $82,700 24-hour low, leaving a narr...