Tornado Cash Swoops to Victory
In August 2022, OFAC sanctioned Tornado Cash, a cryptocurrency mixer, alleging its involvement in laundering over $7 billion in virtual currency since its inception in 2019. The agency claimed that Tornado Cash facilitat...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
In August 2022, OFAC sanctioned Tornado Cash, a cryptocurrency mixer, alleging its involvement in laundering over $7 billion in virtual currency since its inception in 2019. The agency claimed that Tornado Cash facilitated illicit activities, including laundering funds for the North Korean hacking group Lazarus.
The Court’s DecisionOn November 26, 2024, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals delivered its opinion, stating that OFAC overstepped its authority by sanctioning Tornado Cash’s immutable smart contracts. The court emphasized that these smart contracts, being self-executing lines of code without any administrative control, do not constitute “property” under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
The court’s opinion highlighted that while OFAC has the authority to regulate property, the immutable nature of these smart contracts means they cannot be owned or controlled by any entity, and thus, do not fall under OFAC’s jurisdiction.
Source: X
Implications for the Crypto IndustryThis ruling is seen as a significant victory for the cryptocurrency industry, particularly for advocates of decentralized finance (DeFi) and open-source software development. It underscores the legal distinction between sanctioning individuals or entities and sanctioning autonomous software protocols.
Paul Grewal, Chief Legal Officer at Coinbase, remarked, “These smart contracts must now be removed from the sanctions list, and U.S. persons will once again be allowed to use this privacy-protecting protocol.”
While the court’s decision lifts sanctions on Tornado Cash’s smart contracts, it does not preclude OFAC from targeting individuals or entities that misuse such protocols for illicit activities. The ruling calls for a nuanced approach to regulating decentralized technologies, balancing the need for oversight with the importance of innovation and privacy.
As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, this case sets a precedent for how autonomous software protocols are treated under U.S. law, potentially influencing future regulatory actions and the development of decentralized applications.
Why this matters
This research story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on Brave New CoinRelated market context
Investors Cash Out Fast of Bitcoin ETFs but Price Remains Stable
Bitcoin Magazine Investors Cash Out Fast of Bitcoin ETFs but Price Remains Stable American investors have reversed course, cashing...
This public company quit solar for a $5 million Bitcoin bet, now it has just $166,000 in cash
Sono Group’s transition to a Bitcoin-heavy treasury is laying bare the severe financial strain at the core of the restructured com...
CyberWallet users have until Aug. 15 before crypto withdrawals become a smart contract recovery job
Crypto company Cyber is telling CyberWallet and Cyber Passkey Wallet users to move their assets ahead of an Aug. 15 shutdown that...
Kalshi ordered to halt most prediction market contracts in Washington
A Washington court ordered Kalshi to halt most prediction market contracts in the state and implement expanded geofencing by Sept....
Binance’s XAUT perpetual contracts are pulling $2B in daily trading volume, and gold bugs are paying attention
The surge in XAUT trading highlights a shift towards speculative trading in tokenized commodities, potentially influencing market...
Strategy Goes Another Week Without Buying — Or Selling — Bitcoin, Builds Up Cash Reserve
Bitcoin Magazine Strategy Goes Another Week Without Buying — Or Selling — Bitcoin, Builds Up Cash Reserve Bitcoin treasury Strateg...