Ripple Lawsuit News: The SEC Fails To Prove XRP Is A Security
According to the latest reports revealed from the Ripple lawsuit, it seems that the SEC failed to prove that XRP is a security. Check out the latest reports about this below. Ripple lawsuit news is out An important crypt...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
According to the latest reports revealed from the Ripple lawsuit, it seems that the SEC failed to prove that XRP is a security. Check out the latest reports about this below.
Ripple lawsuit news is outAn important crypto legal expert says the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has not proven that XRP is a security in the regulator’s lawsuit against Ripple Labs.
In a lengthy thread, attorney and XRP supporter Jeremy Hogan explained via Twitter why he believes the SEC has so far failed to prove XRP is a security.
Just to refresh your memory, SEC sued Ripple in late 2020 under allegations that the company sold XRP as an unregistered security.
“First, under the legislative definition of a security, XRP can only POSSIBLY fit under the definition of an ‘investment contract.’ It is not a stock or bond, etc… Even the SEC concedes this: ‘investment contract.’”
The #1 reason why XRP is not a Security (a thread).
First, under the legislative definition of a security, XRP can only POSSIBLY fit under the definition of an “investment contract.” It is not a stock or bond, etc..
Even the SEC concedes this: “investment contract.” pic.twitter.com/n9g7ZEos2n
— Jeremy Hogan (@attorneyjeremy1) April 9, 2023
Hogan made sure to explain the fact that the SEC has so far failed to prove that there was a contract of investment for investors in XRP, one of the key features of a security, according to the Howey Test.
“In the Ripple case, the SEC has failed to argue that there was an implied or explicit contract of investment.
Instead it argues that the purchase agreement is all that is required – and that is all it proves.
But that argument tears the ‘investment’ from the ‘contract’…”
He continued and said the following:
“As a simple purchase, without more, cannot be an ‘investment contract,’ it is just an investment (like buying an ounce of gold) as there is no obligation for Ripple to do anything except transfer the asset.”
We suggest that you check out the complete there in order to find out all the important details about the issue.
Why this matters
This security story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on CryptoGazetteRelated market context
Ripple Tokenizes Brazilian Investment Fund & Real Estate Records On XRP Ledger
In a major development confirmed on SEPTEMBER 30, 2026, Confirmed announcement/filing for Ripple Tokenizes Brazilian Investment Fu...
NEAR Intents reports $3.8 million loss after smart contract bug
The exploit highlights vulnerabilities in cross-chain protocols, potentially undermining trust and prompting calls for enhanced se...
MetaMask security incident forces Ethereum staking exits, no funds at risk
An Ethereum security researcher estimates about 0.36 ETH in rewards was diverted, while precautionary exits cover validators holdi...
Ripple quietly made Brazil the center of its XRPL tokenization push
Ripple's Brazilian foothold spans cross-border payments and securities records in a country Chainalysis ranked first for grassroot...
XRP Price Prediction: Ripple Targets 4 Straight Green Months in October
XRP price prediction is slightly bullish as it enters October at $1.50, and traders weigh whether September’s advance can extend t...
Ethereum is preparing a 200 million gas push as its Layer 1 scaling strategy accelerates
Ethereum validators face a configuration choice next week that could determine how aggressively the network tests its next major s...