Ripple Lawsuit News: The SEC Fails To Prove XRP Is A Security
According to the latest reports revealed from the Ripple lawsuit, it seems that the SEC failed to prove that XRP is a security. Check out the latest reports about this below. Ripple lawsuit news is out An important crypt...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
According to the latest reports revealed from the Ripple lawsuit, it seems that the SEC failed to prove that XRP is a security. Check out the latest reports about this below.
Ripple lawsuit news is outAn important crypto legal expert says the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has not proven that XRP is a security in the regulator’s lawsuit against Ripple Labs.
In a lengthy thread, attorney and XRP supporter Jeremy Hogan explained via Twitter why he believes the SEC has so far failed to prove XRP is a security.
Just to refresh your memory, SEC sued Ripple in late 2020 under allegations that the company sold XRP as an unregistered security.
“First, under the legislative definition of a security, XRP can only POSSIBLY fit under the definition of an ‘investment contract.’ It is not a stock or bond, etc… Even the SEC concedes this: ‘investment contract.’”
The #1 reason why XRP is not a Security (a thread).
First, under the legislative definition of a security, XRP can only POSSIBLY fit under the definition of an “investment contract.” It is not a stock or bond, etc..
Even the SEC concedes this: “investment contract.” pic.twitter.com/n9g7ZEos2n
— Jeremy Hogan (@attorneyjeremy1) April 9, 2023
Hogan made sure to explain the fact that the SEC has so far failed to prove that there was a contract of investment for investors in XRP, one of the key features of a security, according to the Howey Test.
“In the Ripple case, the SEC has failed to argue that there was an implied or explicit contract of investment.
Instead it argues that the purchase agreement is all that is required – and that is all it proves.
But that argument tears the ‘investment’ from the ‘contract’…”
He continued and said the following:
“As a simple purchase, without more, cannot be an ‘investment contract,’ it is just an investment (like buying an ounce of gold) as there is no obligation for Ripple to do anything except transfer the asset.”
We suggest that you check out the complete there in order to find out all the important details about the issue.
Why this matters
This security story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on CryptoGazetteRelated market context
Trump to meet Coinbase, Ripple and crypto leaders as CLARITY Act odds collapse to 10%
President Donald Trump and the heads of the SEC and CFTC are expected to meet crypto and prediction-market executives at the White...
Wall Street finally turned staking into a dividend, now Ethereum and Solana want to shrink it
Grayscale's July 17 SEC filings said its Ethereum and Solana staking ETFs would convert staking rewards to cash and distribute the...
Cboe pushes for 3x Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs after 2x crypto funds suffer losses of up to 96%
Cboe BZX is asking the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for an exception to its own generic listing rules so it can list f...
Ethereum (ETH) Price Prediction: ETH Tightens Near $1,880 as Analysts Debate Breakout Towards $3,000 or Another Bear-Market Leg
Ethereum price is consolidating around $1,880 as ETH moves deeper into a tightening technical structure, with traders watching whe...
A staked Ethereum ETF processed $48M in redemptions while keeping 86% of ETH locked, 21Shares filing shows
The 21Shares Ethereum ETF, which trades as TETH, reported $48.4 million in TETH redemptions during the first half of 2026 and ende...
Edelman Financial, Tudor Investment Reveal Significant Bitcoin Holdings
Bitcoin Magazine Edelman Financial, Tudor Investment Reveal Significant Bitcoin Holdings Edelman Financial Engines has disclosed a...