Craig Wright Lied and Forged Documents: Judge Rules
A UK judge has ruled that Craig Wright, who claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin, lied extensively and forged documents during a high-profile trial.In a scathing 231-page judgment, Justice James Mellor...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
A UK judge has ruled that Craig Wright, who claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin, lied extensively and forged documents during a high-profile trial.
In a scathing 231-page judgment, Justice James Mellor stated that Wright "lied to the court repeatedly" and committed forgery "on a grand scale" in a failed attempt to prove he was Nakamoto.
A group of crypto firms brought the civil trial, the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), that sought to prevent Wright from claiming he invented Bitcoin.
BREAKING: 🇬🇧 Judge has just published his ruling in the COPA vs Craig Wright lawsuit that Craig is not Satoshi Nakamoto.
Massive victory for #Bitcoin 👏 pic.twitter.com/rCSewIhsA9
Mellor wrote that Wright presented fake documents and gave false testimony in support of "his biggest lie - his claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto."
The judge determined Wright is neither the author of the Bitcoin white paper nor the person behind the Satoshi pseudonym from 2008-2011.
Furthermore, Mellor ruled Wright does not have copyright ownership that would enable him to sue Bitcoin developers, as he has done in the past.
The judge slammed Wright's narrative as "riddled with inconsistencies and absurd explanations" and said Wright was "not nearly as clever as he thinks he is."
COPA lawyers accused Wright of extensive deception and forgery throughout the trial. They also presented technical evidence exposing fake documents Wright justified with "fluent but ultimately unpersuasive answers."
Following the damning judgment, Wright has already dropped several lawsuits premised on his being Nakamoto. However, Mellor's ruling only prevents him from bringing new claims in the UK, not other jurisdictions.
The case has raised questions about Wright's litigation funding source. Online gambling tycoon Calvin Ayre is rumored to be backing Wright financially, but both men deny this.
Overall, the judge's unequivocal findings represent a major blow to Wright's reputation and credibility. COPA hopes the judgment will discourage further legal action from Wright despite potential appeals.
For the Bitcoin community, it provides a major relief from his past claims and litigation threats.
Why this matters
This bitcoin story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on Bitcoin MagazineRelated market context
Pokemon Crypto Case: Collector Faces Trial Over $55 Million Hack
U.S. indictment alleges two Uranium Finance crypto exploits moved through Tornado Cash before being used to buy Pokemon cards and...
Florida judge orders Fundsz promoters to pay over $30 million in crypto fraud case
The ruling highlights the critical need for stringent oversight in crypto markets to protect investors and deter fraudulent scheme...
Volmex Finance launches Bitcoin implied volatility perpetual futures on Hyperliquid
The launch of Bitcoin volatility futures on a decentralized exchange could democratize access to sophisticated trading strategies,...
Maryland cybersecurity consultant goes on trial for $55M crypto theft
The trial highlights the evolving legal landscape for DeFi security, emphasizing the potential for blockchain forensics in prosecu...
IBIT options implied volatility sinks to 12-month lows as Bitcoin rebounds 37%
Low implied volatility suggests market confidence in Bitcoin's stability, offering cheaper hedging opportunities and attracting in...
CFTC secures over $30 million judgment against defendants in Fundsz fraud case
The CFTC secured a win in court after the agency said two defendants participated in a crypto scheme that they then tried to walk...