Morgan Stanley Strategist Warns of Equities Sell-Off in Response to ‘Hawkish’ Fed Message
On Monday, Morgan Stanley’s equity strategist, Michael Wilson, shared his thoughts on the state of Wall Street. He expressed his belief that a sell-off could be imminent, and that this could occur as a result of U.S. Fed...
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
On Monday, Morgan Stanley’s equity strategist, Michael Wilson, shared his thoughts on the state of Wall Street. He expressed his belief that a sell-off could be imminent, and that this could occur as a result of U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell’s upcoming remarks on Wednesday. Furthermore, there has been a great deal of conjecture surrounding the possibility of the central bank cutting the federal funds rate multiple times throughout the year. However, Wilson believes that investors who are expecting this outcome will ultimately be disappointed.
Powell’s Message Could Spark a ‘Near-Term Negative Surprise for Equities’This Wednesday, all eyes will be on the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, as the U.S. Federal Reserve is poised to raise the benchmark interest rate by 25 basis points (bps). While some economists predict that this hike will be the final one of the year, a few market observers anticipate multiple rate cuts in the future. These speculators point to the recent banking industry turmoil in the U.S. as a potential catalyst for the Fed to loosen its monetary policy.
However, there are several analysts who believe that investors expecting cuts are in for a rude awakening. They caution that the Fed’s commitment to holding rates high and not cutting this year is unwavering, due to persistent inflation. According to Morgan Stanley’s equity strategist, Michael Wilson, U.S. equity markets may be in for a rough ride this week if chairman Jerome Powell fails to meet the market’s expectations of a benchmark rate cut.
Wilson warns that a “hawkish” message from Powell could trigger a “near-term negative surprise for equities,” causing a sell-off. Wilson also notes that the market has grown increasingly reliant on tech stocks with large valuations, which could exacerbate the impact of any negative news. Furthermore, he warns that investors who are banking on the Fed cutting rates this year are likely to be frustrated with the outcome.
“We believe that equities are priced for an optimistic policy outcome (rate cuts in ’23 without the growth downside),” Wilson stated in his note to investors.
Fed Officials Desire to Avoid the Mistakes of Past Fed ChairsThe sentiment that the Federal Reserve will maintain its strict stance on interest rates is not limited to Morgan Stanley’s equity strategist. Claudia Sahm, an American economist and macroeconomic expert, echoed this sentiment on Sunday, stating that Powell had made it clear that the Fed would not cut rates this year and that people should “believe him.”
In a Twitter thread, Sahm thinks the Fed’s stance will be strict for three reasons: the desire to avoid the mistakes of past Fed chairs, the reverence for former chair Paul Volcker’s approach to monetary policy, and the personal experiences of current Fed officials with high inflation in the 1970s and early 1980s. Sahm tweeted:
Markets expect the Fed to cut multiple times this year—referred to as a pivot—while the Fed says it will hold rates high and not cut this year. I believe the Fed.
In response to Claudia Sahm’s comments on the Federal Reserve’s commitment to holding rates high, the Twitter account Wall Street Silver pointed out that while Paul Volcker’s monetary policy and the emergence of new oil sources in the early 1980s helped control inflation, the underlying problems persist.
“The Fed can’t solve this problem,” Wall Street Silver said. They can kill the economy, but as soon as rates come down, the same underlying problems exist and inflation roars back. The Fed only has one tool and will print us into oblivion eventually, because they can’t fix this.” Sahm clarified that she was merely explaining “how the history is viewed inside the Fed, not what’s true.”
Do you think the Federal Reserve’s commitment to holding rates high will be enough to control inflation, or will the underlying problems persist and lead to a potential economic crisis? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.
Why this matters
This cryptocurrency story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on Bitcoin NewsRelated market context
Hot Inflation Data Puts Bitcoin Under Pressure, but ‘Difficult’ Isn’t ‘Bearish’: CoinShares
Bitcoin Magazine Hot Inflation Data Puts Bitcoin Under Pressure, but ‘Difficult’ Isn’t ‘Bearish’: CoinShares Bitcoin’s price has d...
Polymarket Bitcoin and Rate Hike Odds Shift as CME Says No Change
Polymarket put the odds of a 25-basis-point Federal Reserve rate hike in October at 23%, with $43 million traded, while CME FedWat...
Binance bStocks Hits $1 Billion As Tokenized Stock Trading Accelerates
TL;DR: Binance says its bStocks tokenized-equity offering has surpassed $1 billion in assets under management, four months after l...
Strategy passes JPMorgan in trading volume, ranks as 19th most-traded US stock
MSTR's rise in trading volume highlights the growing influence of crypto-linked stocks, offering high volatility and liquidity for...
BIS paper finds banks could slow stablecoin growth by raising rates
Rising bank rates could curb stablecoin growth, impacting monetary policy, regulation, and competition between banks and digital c...
Borderless.xyz report finds stablecoin payments beat bank FX rates
Stablecoin payments' efficiency over banks could reshape cross-border transactions, emphasizing dynamic provider selection to mini...