Why Anett Rolikova of Ethereum Magicians Doesn't Like EIP-1559
EIP-1559, the August Ethereum protocol change to "burn" transaction fees and thereby goose ETH's value, feels like ancient history by now. But one of the top voices in Ethereum makes the case that it should be revisited....
Archive context
Older archive item. Useful for background and entity history, but not a fresh market-moving signal.
EIP-1559, the August Ethereum protocol change to "burn" transaction fees and thereby goose ETH's value, feels like ancient history by now. But one of the top voices in Ethereum makes the case that it should be revisited.
Anett Rolikova is part of the three-person leadership team of the Fellowship of Ethereum Magicians, which coordinates discussion around changes to the blockchain's code and technical fixes. She told Decrypt at last week's Messari Mainnet conference that EIP-1559 has been a disappointment.
"It's very controversial even for me, kind of an Ethereum core member," she said, adding later that because of the change "Ethereum became so unusable. I mean it's usable for people who can afford such high gas fees."
EIP-1559 was an Ethereum Improvement Proposal to add deflationary pressure to the Ethereum network. Unlike Bitcoin, which has a cap of 21 million coins, Ethereum until recently had no way of curbing endless inflation. EIP-1559 solved that by charging users a flat fee for most transactions (except in cases of high network congestion). That meant no more guessing how much to give the miners who validate transactions. And no more paying fees directly to miners. Instead, that ETH would be destroyed. Now, with each new block that's created, miners receive a couple of ETH as a reward but a little bit of the currency supply disappears forever.
Toward the beginning of September, EIP-1559 appeared to be a clear success. The price of ETH was up around 50% since the code change went into effect, brushing up against $4,000 for the first time since May. Miners' revenue was also trending upward—in both ETH and dollar terms—despite their concerns that 1559 would take money out of their pockets.
But with the price of ETH slouching back toward pre-1559 levels, things look less rosy for users, who must still time their transactions to avoid periods of high congestion. (Though it's impossible to know what would have happened without the change.)
Ethereum Co-Creator ‘Confident’ About Next Steps After London Hard ForkAnd Rolikova is right about the fees going up. Those behind EIP-1559 said beforehand the reduction of fees would be modest, but fees have instead risen. Although they haven't hit some of the levels seen during late 2020 and early 2021 when DeFi and then NFT mania hit Ethereum, August and September saw sharp increases.
According to data from Glassnode, in June and July, the average ETH transaction fee was 0.002 ETH ($4.64 at the time) and 0.0025 ($5.32), respectively. In August, it more than doubled to nearly 0.006 ($18.14) as the price of ETH also ballooned.
Rolikova said the shift was hard to forecast, even after deploying economic models. Who could tell, for instance, that the market for Ethereum-based NFT collectibles would show staying power? But, she said, it's not too late: "I have a very dumb idea which people will not agree with, which is fork Ethereum back to pre-EIP-1559 and just leave it like that."
The Ethereum Magician is only half-joking, and she knows it won't really happen. However, it's the type of conversation she moderates on the Fellowship's forum—and indicative of the discourse among core devs, who don't always agree on the path forward.
Mostly, people have moved on. "There are many other EIPs that are trying to get onto the chain" in advance of the next network upgrade in a few months, she said.
Not everyone will agree on which ones are deserving.
Why this matters
This ethereum story adds another data point to the current market tape and is useful when read alongside nearby source coverage.
Original source
Read on DecryptRelated market context
SEC Examiners Set Sights on Tokenization at Clearing Agencies for Fiscal 2027
The SEC’s Division of Examinations has named tokenization among the “high-risk areas” its staff will focus on when examining clear...
Ether ETFs Are Having Their Worst Month of 2026. Who Buys Once Bitmine Stops?
Ether’s (ETH) demand this year has largely come from two places: spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and Bitmine Immersion Technolog...
Swell Freezes swETH and rswETH Withdrawals Until It Corrects Their Exchange Rates
Holders of Swell‘s swETH and rswETH cannot deposit or withdraw through the protocol after the team said at 2:39 a.m. ET Friday it...
Austin Griffith Demonstrates How Fast Bots Can Drain Weak Ethereum Keys
Austin Griffith of the Ethereum Foundation put about $1 in an Ethereum wallet whose private key was the number 6969, and bots went...
Ethereum Delays Glamsterdam Test On Hoodi Over Smart Contract Compatibility Questions
TL;DR: Ethereum developers have removed the planned October 26 Glamsterdam activation on Hoodi while they investigate EIP-8037 int...
Ethereum Glamsterdam Upgrade Delayed Over Smart Contract Security Risks
Ethereum developers have postponed the Glamsterdam upgrade on the Hoodi testnet after researchers identified potential security ri...