FDIC pins Signature Bank’s failure on poor governance and illiquidity
The FDIC blamed Signature’s board of directors and management for pursuing “unrestrained growth” using uninsured deposits without implementing liquidity risk management strategies.
The FDIC blamed Signature’s board of directors and management for pursuing “unrestrained growth” using uninsured deposits without implementing liquidity risk management strategies.
Original source
Read on CointelegraphRelated market context
The future of vaults: neobanks and invisible DeFi
The following is a guest post and opinion from Vincent Maliepaard, VP of Marketing at Sentora. On January 26, 2026, Kraken launche...
Japan’s SBI is using XRP to solve a banking problem
SBI Shinsei Bank is reportedly offering crypto deposit rewards to customers, with vouchers worth 20% of their interest payments re...
British forces board sanctioned Russian oil tanker in English Channel, exposing crypto-paid shadow fleet
The operation highlights the growing use of cryptocurrencies for sanctions evasion, potentially increasing regulatory scrutiny on...
Sam Bankman-Fried loses appeal against crypto fraud conviction
The ruling underscores the judiciary's commitment to equating crypto fraud with traditional financial crimes, setting a stern prec...
Sky Governance Proposal Seeks To Double USDC PSM Buffer To $800 Million
TL;DR BA Labs has proposed doubling key LITE-PSM-USDC-A parameters in the Sky stablecoin system from 400 million to 800 million. T...
Cardano Discord Migration Plan After X Drama for Governance
Key Takeaways: Charles Hoskinson is looking to move these Cardano community discussions from X to Discord. All cardano and midnigh...